Active Users:552 Time:18/12/2025 04:11:30 PM
I agree. Joel Send a noteboard - 18/01/2011 06:21:43 PM
The number of occasions of channeling women hurting him is undefined. The AS kidnapping him is certainly one. If things go badly the Field of Merrilor could be the second.
But Perrin being at Dragonmount was the second time.

Disagree. Perrin didn't do anything there, he just observed. When reading it I was looking for some sign that he might have done something but there was no indication that Perrin's presence mattered to Rand.

My impression was that Rands epiphany was entirely about him, had to be for it to mean anything. I don't think the Shadow Perrin witnessed hovering was any more of a factor than he was, which is to say, NONE. If the DO and Perrin have a tug of war with Rand as the rope it's not his personal anognorisis, and it's not like Perrin can spend every moment at Rands elbow waving the Shadow away so he stays sane.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Second time Perrin must be there for Rand vs Two times Aes Sedai may hurt him - 22/12/2010 10:29:49 PM 1999 Views
I see a stampede of Egwene apologists on the way *NM* - 23/12/2010 01:03:56 AM 546 Views
I just want to point out.. - 23/12/2010 01:18:29 AM 1090 Views
Re: I just want to point out.. - 23/12/2010 06:51:05 AM 956 Views
- 28/12/2010 01:16:20 PM 771 Views
I'm still of the opinion that Rand is headed towards the same disaster LTT did - 04/01/2011 06:42:51 PM 834 Views
I think they're both partially right... - 05/01/2011 11:16:21 AM 766 Views
Er no - 23/12/2010 12:22:04 PM 1025 Views
The viewing says "women who can channel" - 23/12/2010 04:13:29 PM 906 Views
The second one isn't connected. - 23/12/2010 05:16:30 PM 1134 Views
nail on the head *NM* - 24/12/2010 01:27:41 AM 413 Views
Re: The second one isn't connected. - 24/12/2010 05:29:16 AM 1000 Views
Re: The second one isn't connected. - 24/12/2010 11:32:59 AM 827 Views
Re: The second one isn't connected. - 24/12/2010 06:06:04 PM 842 Views
Nope. - 24/12/2010 07:44:37 PM 829 Views
Re: Nope. - 24/12/2010 08:16:25 PM 861 Views
Re: Nope. - 26/12/2010 03:22:38 PM 924 Views
I agree. - 18/01/2011 06:21:43 PM 785 Views
+1 - 19/01/2011 01:46:39 AM 871 Views

Reply to Message