Active Users:781 Time:29/10/2026 09:19:34 AM
Gateway Talent? Nargs Send a noteboard - 07/03/2011 08:19:12 PM
For instance, gateway talent we saw in TGS.

How is someone so weak able to create gateways when others of greater strength cannot create the same gateways? what are the mechanics behind that talent?

How is that possible?

If it is a different weave then others should be able to learn it? If it is just requiring less power then that is stupid.

BTW, refresh my memory: the initiate at the Black Tower - was he able to create large gateways or just small ones?
This message last edited by Nargs on 07/03/2011 at 09:03:33 PM
Reply to message
Talents don't make much sense - 07/03/2011 09:34:56 AM 2191 Views
I agree - 07/03/2011 01:18:13 PM 1032 Views
Re: Talents don't make much sense - 07/03/2011 02:21:46 PM 1267 Views
Re: Talents don't make much sense - 07/03/2011 04:15:28 PM 1238 Views
Re: Talents don't make much sense - 07/03/2011 03:51:17 PM 1379 Views
I have a slightly different view on your last two points - 07/03/2011 07:30:43 PM 1155 Views
Re: I have a slightly different view on your last two points - 08/03/2011 01:29:46 PM 1075 Views
thanks for the quote ... truly appreciate it - 08/03/2011 05:07:19 PM 1073 Views
Re: thanks for the quote ... truly appreciate it - 08/03/2011 08:59:18 PM 1176 Views
I don't find it all that complicated of far fetched - 09/03/2011 04:34:03 PM 988 Views
One thought on the Sea Folk example - 08/03/2011 07:27:15 PM 979 Views
also very possible ... I'm just thinking "outloud" so to speak - 09/03/2011 04:32:08 PM 991 Views
No worries - 'thinking out loud' and going on tangents are my favorite hobbies here - 09/03/2011 05:54:42 PM 979 Views
I don't think they are supposed to make 'sense', really. Maria gave info about Talents in a Q&A - 07/03/2011 04:05:40 PM 1275 Views
Gateway Talent? - 07/03/2011 08:19:12 PM 1019 Views
Re: Gateway Talent? - 08/03/2011 12:09:21 PM 1031 Views
Re: Gateway Talent? - 08/03/2011 02:12:53 PM 1017 Views
Re: Gateway Talent? - 08/03/2011 11:15:55 PM 1087 Views

Reply to Message