Active Users:330 Time:28/04/2024 10:00:18 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
That scene was weird redqueen Send a noteboard - 18/05/2011 02:37:44 PM
Linkage: http://www.readandfindout.com/wheeloftime/messageboard/169600/

I think it grew out of a discussion on how a sul'dam could appear to be in control of the link when she never in fact channels.

I've read it, very interesting: you've convinced me it a sort of link too different from the Link to be considerate more than e distant relative, or not related at all.
That said, there also is a thing I'm doubtful about:
the sul'dam has utter and complete control over the damane's channelling. The sul'dam can have her weave whatever she wants, without ever having to command it. It is the damane's channeling, but the a'dam compels so efficiently that the damane need never be consulted at all

I remembered this very differently, at least from TGH: the sul'dam had something like of a "veto" on all the damane's channelling, but couldn't actually force her to do anything, and that's the reason damane need to be "trained" instead of just dragged on: if the damane doesn't actively co-operate, no weave forms.
When Tuon did it I seem to recall something odd and different, yes, but I guess I just ignored it since it didn't add up with what I knew until then :V


It was strange not just because it was the first time we'd seen a sul'dam channel through her damane like that, but also because Tuon was able to wear a bracelet on each wrist. How can someone be part of two different links at once?

There was some speculation that the 'channeling-through' ability was either not widely known or not widely practised by sul'dam, perhaps because it brought the sul'dam closer to actually channeling themselves. Some thought it was a secret known only to the Imperial Family. I'm more inclined to think that they would train damane even if they didn't technically have to because a fighter with hundreds of years of experience is better than a fighter with single/tens of years. It's more efficient to teach the damane the weaves than to keep having to teach new generations of sul'dam.

Or, you know, maybe RJ just flaked and didn't think that scene through properly.
Reply to message
How come every Forsaken wasn’t loaded with angreal when they were sealed in the Bore? Night Walker - 07/05/2011 02:35:18 AM 2160 Views
Several reasons exist Ryan - 07/05/2011 08:49:41 AM 1190 Views
Re: Several reasons exist Watcher - 07/05/2011 03:09:51 PM 1059 Views
Re: Several reasons exist Night Walker - 07/05/2011 04:29:39 PM 1073 Views
No Lo'oris - 07/05/2011 08:36:49 PM 852 Views
Re: No Night Walker - 07/05/2011 09:16:18 PM 851 Views
Or another question redqueen - 07/05/2011 04:07:31 PM 900 Views
Re: Or another question Night Walker - 07/05/2011 04:24:21 PM 982 Views
Which would be a shame. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 09/05/2011 08:17:23 PM 837 Views
There's no reason to pack heat for a meeting at SG newyorkersedai - 07/05/2011 06:08:53 PM 1072 Views
Re: There's no reason to pack heat for a meeting at SG Night Walker - 07/05/2011 06:23:14 PM 871 Views
Yeah, but newyorkersedai - 07/05/2011 07:30:45 PM 872 Views
They probably left them all at home.. .and not by choice... DomA - 07/05/2011 08:48:50 PM 1079 Views
Re: They probably left them all at home.. .and not by choice... Night Walker - 07/05/2011 09:54:11 PM 956 Views
Re: They probably left them all at home.. .and not by choice... Ryan - 08/05/2011 05:48:01 PM 862 Views
Uh whatever! malekithe - 11/05/2011 07:35:54 AM 1254 Views
Re: Uh whatever! Lo'oris - 11/05/2011 10:02:40 AM 1008 Views
Meet malekithe. Cannoli - 11/05/2011 08:06:01 PM 900 Views
Meet Cannoli malekithe - 18/05/2011 07:47:46 AM 1198 Views
Re: Meet Cannoli Cannoli - 19/05/2011 01:45:03 PM 1150 Views
Whatever whatever! malekithe - 18/05/2011 07:43:31 AM 1013 Views
But the Dark One could control what the One Power did in Shayol Ghul RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/05/2011 07:14:43 PM 893 Views
it could also be that he told them to, because he could. LadyLorraine - 11/05/2011 10:18:34 PM 881 Views
Re: it could also be that he told them to, because he could. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/05/2011 11:50:27 PM 829 Views
I was under impression they weren't very aware of the "destroying reality" part LadyLorraine - 12/05/2011 06:06:56 AM 809 Views
yep (on both) *NM* Lo'oris - 12/05/2011 08:37:59 AM 453 Views
I think they were at least in some part RugbyPlayingAshaman - 12/05/2011 04:15:26 PM 749 Views
RJ stuffed up... Shannow - 08/05/2011 02:13:15 PM 963 Views
Re: I don't think so Watcher - 08/05/2011 03:09:29 PM 1047 Views
Good points Shannow - 08/05/2011 03:13:57 PM 849 Views
well, given that we don't really KNOW how Cuendillar was made... LadyLorraine - 09/05/2011 06:11:32 AM 911 Views
Re: well, given that we don't really KNOW how Cuendillar was made... Lo'oris - 09/05/2011 10:57:45 AM 868 Views
I suppose that depends on what you want to get out of a fantasy book. *NM* LadyLorraine - 09/05/2011 10:28:48 PM 484 Views
Do we really *know* that cuendiar is indestructble? HyogaRott - 10/05/2011 02:46:49 PM 875 Views
We don't, although simplicity=/=weakness. Another scenario LadyLorraine - 10/05/2011 07:08:57 PM 760 Views
Sort of malekithe - 11/05/2011 07:49:10 AM 1173 Views
Re: RJ stuffed up... Lo'oris - 08/05/2011 03:14:20 PM 903 Views
Not plastic, more like electronics. Gher - 11/05/2011 03:26:53 PM 974 Views
I missed this post, it's very well thought! *NM* Lo'oris - 19/05/2011 11:26:00 AM 519 Views
my personal theory with other thoughts Nolan - 09/05/2011 08:10:34 PM 925 Views
Re: my personal theory with other thoughts Night Walker - 10/05/2011 02:10:13 AM 906 Views
Re: my personal theory with other thoughts Lo'oris - 10/05/2011 08:07:50 AM 839 Views
Some people would. Gher - 11/05/2011 02:42:25 PM 879 Views
Re: Some people would. Lo'oris - 11/05/2011 03:01:01 PM 771 Views
It definitely wasn't common. Gher - 11/05/2011 03:45:45 PM 916 Views
Re: It definitely wasn't common. Lo'oris - 11/05/2011 04:03:15 PM 749 Views
and if you had prophesy??? *NM* Nolan - 04/06/2011 03:10:40 AM 541 Views
My personal theory is that angreal and sa'angreal require Circles of male and female channelers RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/05/2011 07:24:34 PM 844 Views
Re: My personal theory is that angreal and sa'angreal require Circles of male and female channelers redqueen - 11/05/2011 07:45:03 PM 797 Views
makes sense *NM* Lo'oris - 12/05/2011 08:36:08 AM 471 Views
Er, though - redqueen - 16/05/2011 06:08:55 PM 815 Views
Re: Er, though - Lo'oris - 17/05/2011 12:38:14 PM 743 Views
Don't think so redqueen - 17/05/2011 01:09:36 PM 920 Views
Re: Don't think so Lo'oris - 17/05/2011 01:15:53 PM 767 Views
I imagine they could redqueen - 17/05/2011 01:45:03 PM 851 Views
Re: I imagine they could Lo'oris - 17/05/2011 01:49:53 PM 810 Views
That makes sense redqueen - 17/05/2011 02:16:05 PM 843 Views
Re: That makes sense Lo'oris - 17/05/2011 03:46:04 PM 747 Views
Re: That makes sense redqueen - 17/05/2011 04:21:11 PM 768 Views
Re: That makes sense Lo'oris - 18/05/2011 01:18:43 PM 793 Views
That scene was weird redqueen - 18/05/2011 02:37:44 PM 775 Views
Re: That scene was weird Lo'oris - 19/05/2011 10:41:59 AM 766 Views
We don't really know how the a'dam are made (I see this brought up in the other posts, though) RugbyPlayingAshaman - 23/05/2011 03:11:18 PM 937 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes