Active Users:1545 Time:02/08/2026 05:13:11 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
That scene was weird redqueen Send a noteboard - 18/05/2011 02:37:44 PM
Linkage: http://www.readandfindout.com/wheeloftime/messageboard/169600/

I think it grew out of a discussion on how a sul'dam could appear to be in control of the link when she never in fact channels.

I've read it, very interesting: you've convinced me it a sort of link too different from the Link to be considerate more than e distant relative, or not related at all.
That said, there also is a thing I'm doubtful about:
the sul'dam has utter and complete control over the damane's channelling. The sul'dam can have her weave whatever she wants, without ever having to command it. It is the damane's channeling, but the a'dam compels so efficiently that the damane need never be consulted at all

I remembered this very differently, at least from TGH: the sul'dam had something like of a "veto" on all the damane's channelling, but couldn't actually force her to do anything, and that's the reason damane need to be "trained" instead of just dragged on: if the damane doesn't actively co-operate, no weave forms.
When Tuon did it I seem to recall something odd and different, yes, but I guess I just ignored it since it didn't add up with what I knew until then :V


It was strange not just because it was the first time we'd seen a sul'dam channel through her damane like that, but also because Tuon was able to wear a bracelet on each wrist. How can someone be part of two different links at once?

There was some speculation that the 'channeling-through' ability was either not widely known or not widely practised by sul'dam, perhaps because it brought the sul'dam closer to actually channeling themselves. Some thought it was a secret known only to the Imperial Family. I'm more inclined to think that they would train damane even if they didn't technically have to because a fighter with hundreds of years of experience is better than a fighter with single/tens of years. It's more efficient to teach the damane the weaves than to keep having to teach new generations of sul'dam.

Or, you know, maybe RJ just flaked and didn't think that scene through properly.
Reply to message
How come every Forsaken wasn’t loaded with angreal when they were sealed in the Bore? Night Walker - 07/05/2011 02:35:18 AM 2688 Views
Several reasons exist Ryan - 07/05/2011 08:49:41 AM 1684 Views
Re: Several reasons exist Watcher - 07/05/2011 03:09:51 PM 1597 Views
Re: Several reasons exist Night Walker - 07/05/2011 04:29:39 PM 1586 Views
No Lo'oris - 07/05/2011 08:36:49 PM 1322 Views
Re: No Night Walker - 07/05/2011 09:16:18 PM 1331 Views
Or another question redqueen - 07/05/2011 04:07:31 PM 1361 Views
Re: Or another question Night Walker - 07/05/2011 04:24:21 PM 1471 Views
Which would be a shame. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 09/05/2011 08:17:23 PM 1351 Views
There's no reason to pack heat for a meeting at SG newyorkersedai - 07/05/2011 06:08:53 PM 1548 Views
Re: There's no reason to pack heat for a meeting at SG Night Walker - 07/05/2011 06:23:14 PM 1385 Views
Yeah, but newyorkersedai - 07/05/2011 07:30:45 PM 1345 Views
They probably left them all at home.. .and not by choice... DomA - 07/05/2011 08:48:50 PM 1615 Views
Re: They probably left them all at home.. .and not by choice... Night Walker - 07/05/2011 09:54:11 PM 1512 Views
Re: They probably left them all at home.. .and not by choice... Ryan - 08/05/2011 05:48:01 PM 1381 Views
Uh whatever! malekithe - 11/05/2011 07:35:54 AM 1865 Views
Re: Uh whatever! Lo'oris - 11/05/2011 10:02:40 AM 1529 Views
Meet malekithe. Cannoli - 11/05/2011 08:06:01 PM 1401 Views
Meet Cannoli malekithe - 18/05/2011 07:47:46 AM 1769 Views
Re: Meet Cannoli Cannoli - 19/05/2011 01:45:03 PM 1677 Views
Whatever whatever! malekithe - 18/05/2011 07:43:31 AM 1554 Views
But the Dark One could control what the One Power did in Shayol Ghul RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/05/2011 07:14:43 PM 1392 Views
it could also be that he told them to, because he could. LadyLorraine - 11/05/2011 10:18:34 PM 1380 Views
Re: it could also be that he told them to, because he could. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/05/2011 11:50:27 PM 1337 Views
I was under impression they weren't very aware of the "destroying reality" part LadyLorraine - 12/05/2011 06:06:56 AM 1271 Views
yep (on both) *NM* Lo'oris - 12/05/2011 08:37:59 AM 698 Views
I think they were at least in some part RugbyPlayingAshaman - 12/05/2011 04:15:26 PM 1200 Views
RJ stuffed up... Shannow - 08/05/2011 02:13:15 PM 1463 Views
Re: I don't think so Watcher - 08/05/2011 03:09:29 PM 1527 Views
Good points Shannow - 08/05/2011 03:13:57 PM 1344 Views
well, given that we don't really KNOW how Cuendillar was made... LadyLorraine - 09/05/2011 06:11:32 AM 1375 Views
Re: well, given that we don't really KNOW how Cuendillar was made... Lo'oris - 09/05/2011 10:57:45 AM 1361 Views
I suppose that depends on what you want to get out of a fantasy book. *NM* LadyLorraine - 09/05/2011 10:28:48 PM 718 Views
Do we really *know* that cuendiar is indestructble? HyogaRott - 10/05/2011 02:46:49 PM 1339 Views
We don't, although simplicity=/=weakness. Another scenario LadyLorraine - 10/05/2011 07:08:57 PM 1266 Views
Sort of malekithe - 11/05/2011 07:49:10 AM 1789 Views
Re: RJ stuffed up... Lo'oris - 08/05/2011 03:14:20 PM 1377 Views
Not plastic, more like electronics. Gher - 11/05/2011 03:26:53 PM 1470 Views
I missed this post, it's very well thought! *NM* Lo'oris - 19/05/2011 11:26:00 AM 762 Views
my personal theory with other thoughts Nolan - 09/05/2011 08:10:34 PM 1388 Views
Re: my personal theory with other thoughts Night Walker - 10/05/2011 02:10:13 AM 1361 Views
Re: my personal theory with other thoughts Lo'oris - 10/05/2011 08:07:50 AM 1315 Views
Some people would. Gher - 11/05/2011 02:42:25 PM 1318 Views
Re: Some people would. Lo'oris - 11/05/2011 03:01:01 PM 1228 Views
It definitely wasn't common. Gher - 11/05/2011 03:45:45 PM 1396 Views
Re: It definitely wasn't common. Lo'oris - 11/05/2011 04:03:15 PM 1215 Views
and if you had prophesy??? *NM* Nolan - 04/06/2011 03:10:40 AM 787 Views
My personal theory is that angreal and sa'angreal require Circles of male and female channelers RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/05/2011 07:24:34 PM 1324 Views
Re: My personal theory is that angreal and sa'angreal require Circles of male and female channelers redqueen - 11/05/2011 07:45:03 PM 1279 Views
makes sense *NM* Lo'oris - 12/05/2011 08:36:08 AM 741 Views
Er, though - redqueen - 16/05/2011 06:08:55 PM 1316 Views
Re: Er, though - Lo'oris - 17/05/2011 12:38:14 PM 1205 Views
Don't think so redqueen - 17/05/2011 01:09:36 PM 1420 Views
Re: Don't think so Lo'oris - 17/05/2011 01:15:53 PM 1271 Views
I imagine they could redqueen - 17/05/2011 01:45:03 PM 1364 Views
Re: I imagine they could Lo'oris - 17/05/2011 01:49:53 PM 1305 Views
That makes sense redqueen - 17/05/2011 02:16:05 PM 1333 Views
Re: That makes sense Lo'oris - 17/05/2011 03:46:04 PM 1290 Views
Re: That makes sense redqueen - 17/05/2011 04:21:11 PM 1257 Views
Re: That makes sense Lo'oris - 18/05/2011 01:18:43 PM 1360 Views
That scene was weird redqueen - 18/05/2011 02:37:44 PM 1232 Views
Re: That scene was weird Lo'oris - 19/05/2011 10:41:59 AM 1240 Views
We don't really know how the a'dam are made (I see this brought up in the other posts, though) RugbyPlayingAshaman - 23/05/2011 03:11:18 PM 1392 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes