Active Users:431 Time:17/09/2025 11:21:20 PM
Not quite... fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 25/03/2012 08:34:49 PM
But that has absolutely no legal bearing whatsoever. Did the United States cede New Orleans when they failed The city? You could argue this point all over the place, but it's ultimately the legal side that matters here.

Andor is a feudal society, and the Queen had authority over the Two Rivers because she promised to protect it. She failed, she no longer has authority.

As Elayne says in ToM, any Andoran soldiers and tax collectors would have been rebuffed by the TR folk in the past. They obviously didn;t expect Trollocs, and didn't consider themselves Andoran citizens. They were basically in a passive rebellion against Andor for hundreds of years, and Andor let that pass.

The feudal concept goes both ways. You can demand protection if you pay the lords taxes and agree for your men to be levied when he leaves them. The TR people didn't want any of the latter. I don't see where they can claim the right to secede on the basis of an invasion no one could have possibly foreseen, and which Andoran soldiers would have arrived in force to defeat the moment they heard of it.

After all, if the TR folk were loyal Andoran citizens, why in the world didn't they write to Morghase the moment Trollocs poked their heads into Andor in tEotW? Why not warn her some might head her way? Why, a "loyal TR man" even visited Queen Morghase and despite her just treatment of him, said nothing to her about a threat to her kingdom!
Reply to message
Bad Elayne! No biscuit! - 18/02/2012 10:13:54 PM 2402 Views
You are assigning your 21st century view onto people with totally different circumstances - 18/02/2012 11:33:56 PM 1113 Views
The Queen of Andor lost all authority over the Two Rivers when she failed to protect it. *NM* - 25/03/2012 02:53:23 PM 579 Views
Which is why they elected their own lord - 25/03/2012 06:25:31 PM 1025 Views
Feudal law. - 25/03/2012 07:52:25 PM 1085 Views
Not quite... - 25/03/2012 08:34:49 PM 1002 Views
All that, PLUS.. - 25/03/2012 09:55:26 PM 1221 Views
Re: Not quite... - 26/03/2012 03:53:46 PM 1375 Views
And she has not tried to exert authority over them - 25/03/2012 10:33:44 PM 1092 Views
Yes, absolutely. I remember saying this back when I first read the book. - 18/02/2012 11:44:19 PM 1407 Views
No, you are not. - 19/02/2012 03:44:04 AM 1130 Views
Re: Yes, absolutely. I remember saying this back when I first read the book. - 20/02/2012 03:11:14 AM 1491 Views
Re: Yes, absolutely. I remember saying this back when I first read the book. - 20/02/2012 06:22:21 AM 1015 Views
Failed to click "Edit" instead of "Reply". - 20/02/2012 06:23:18 AM 1121 Views
"Damn sister married the Pope instead of my chosen Lord Ohsoimportant" - 25/03/2012 03:50:06 PM 1162 Views
Nobles and Ishara's blood - 03/04/2012 02:59:03 PM 1078 Views
Okay, I admit it, there is no way I am reading such a long post about Elayne..... - 19/02/2012 08:14:53 PM 1076 Views
it was a bear to read but enlightening none the less. *NM* - 20/02/2012 08:49:35 AM 612 Views
The Caraline treatment. - 25/03/2012 02:41:12 PM 1044 Views
Do you Colavaer Saighan? I don't recall Caraline having her lands and titles stripped - 25/03/2012 10:44:57 PM 1086 Views
Yes, sorry about the mixup. Names sound the same. *NM* - 26/03/2012 02:52:18 PM 716 Views
Re: Bad Elayne! No biscuit! - 27/03/2012 07:39:05 PM 1021 Views
Perrin is Rand's servant, so TR belongs to Rand *NM* *NM* - 12/04/2012 07:30:46 PM 788 Views

Reply to Message