Active Users:684 Time:30/01/2026 02:35:31 AM
Re: Darrel K Sweet's AMOL cover Praziquantel Send a noteboard - 20/04/2012 05:11:25 PM
Dragonmount.com announced yesterday that the (unfinished) cover for AMOL by Darrel K Sweet will be posted on their site, at 1 pm Eastern. It's the one that he was working on when he passed away last December. It's a thing I've hoped would be released, so I'm really looking forward to it.

I have no idea if Michael Whelan, the person who was asked to do the final cover (he also does the new ebook covers), will be using this cover as a starting point for his own, but personally I would be very surprised.

Just a side note: why is there no AMOL topic?

As I have said before, I believe the final cover will be broken up into three separate covers, which will require an additional two books to be written for them. They may include the occasional anachronism or two to reflect the details of the underlying story that is being told.
Reply to message
Darrel K Sweet's AMOL cover - 20/04/2012 12:03:10 PM 1626 Views
Re: Darrel K Sweet's AMOL cover - 20/04/2012 05:11:25 PM 1071 Views
Re: Darrel K Sweet's AMOL cover - 20/04/2012 09:56:56 PM 991 Views
Here's the actual cover sketch - 21/04/2012 02:01:03 PM 1258 Views
It's pretty awful. - 21/04/2012 03:48:54 PM 1167 Views
If you read the stuff... - 21/04/2012 06:38:46 PM 1302 Views
I think it's supposed to refer to Min's viewing, rather than the boat Dream/Foretelling - 21/04/2012 09:23:32 PM 1004 Views
i actually think it looks pretty cool - 22/04/2012 03:02:52 AM 847 Views
Re: I think it's supposed to refer to Min's viewing, - 22/04/2012 04:30:42 AM 1130 Views
Re: I think it's supposed to refer to Min's viewing, - 26/04/2012 06:00:21 PM 883 Views
I've got to agree with you there. - 22/04/2012 03:59:08 PM 945 Views
They appear to have deleted a critical comment I left there last week - 28/04/2012 09:42:05 PM 1024 Views
Re: Darrel K Sweet's AMOL cover *NM* - 22/04/2012 09:11:50 PM 432 Views
Re: Darrel K Sweet's AMOL cover - 22/04/2012 09:15:30 PM 912 Views

Reply to Message