Active Users:484 Time:14/12/2025 08:07:45 PM
Re: Darrel K Sweet's AMOL cover Praziquantel Send a noteboard - 20/04/2012 05:11:25 PM
Dragonmount.com announced yesterday that the (unfinished) cover for AMOL by Darrel K Sweet will be posted on their site, at 1 pm Eastern. It's the one that he was working on when he passed away last December. It's a thing I've hoped would be released, so I'm really looking forward to it.

I have no idea if Michael Whelan, the person who was asked to do the final cover (he also does the new ebook covers), will be using this cover as a starting point for his own, but personally I would be very surprised.

Just a side note: why is there no AMOL topic?

As I have said before, I believe the final cover will be broken up into three separate covers, which will require an additional two books to be written for them. They may include the occasional anachronism or two to reflect the details of the underlying story that is being told.
Reply to message
Darrel K Sweet's AMOL cover - 20/04/2012 12:03:10 PM 1592 Views
Re: Darrel K Sweet's AMOL cover - 20/04/2012 05:11:25 PM 1025 Views
Re: Darrel K Sweet's AMOL cover - 20/04/2012 09:56:56 PM 966 Views
Here's the actual cover sketch - 21/04/2012 02:01:03 PM 1213 Views
It's pretty awful. - 21/04/2012 03:48:54 PM 1136 Views
If you read the stuff... - 21/04/2012 06:38:46 PM 1256 Views
I think it's supposed to refer to Min's viewing, rather than the boat Dream/Foretelling - 21/04/2012 09:23:32 PM 951 Views
i actually think it looks pretty cool - 22/04/2012 03:02:52 AM 805 Views
Re: I think it's supposed to refer to Min's viewing, - 22/04/2012 04:30:42 AM 1085 Views
Re: I think it's supposed to refer to Min's viewing, - 26/04/2012 06:00:21 PM 853 Views
I've got to agree with you there. - 22/04/2012 03:59:08 PM 906 Views
They appear to have deleted a critical comment I left there last week - 28/04/2012 09:42:05 PM 1001 Views
Re: Darrel K Sweet's AMOL cover *NM* - 22/04/2012 09:11:50 PM 421 Views
Re: Darrel K Sweet's AMOL cover - 22/04/2012 09:15:30 PM 875 Views

Reply to Message