Active Users:2329 Time:18/06/2026 12:39:31 AM
I did notice that on my reread Terez Send a noteboard - 20/09/2012 07:19:57 AM
Just citing Brandon because he mentions it all the time, and generally he's correct. I think RJ used narrative contractions slightly more often in the early books, but even then, not very often. My best guess is that he did it instinctively, and realized somewhere down the road that it was an aspect of his style, at which point it became essentially a rule. As for whether it's 'all right' to use any particular narrative style in general, there are a lot of differing perspectives in that regard, but RJ's narrative style is part of the feel of WoT. Brandon doesn't feel comfortable trying to imitate it, and I get that, but it does make a difference to some of us, and sometimes it seems to us that the differences are simple and not too difficult to address.
Reply to message
AMoL Prologue: DAMMIT SANDERSON! They are MEN and WOMEN, not PERSONS!!!!!!! - 19/09/2012 10:25:42 PM 1823 Views
Agreed. And isn't people the plural for person? *NM* - 19/09/2012 10:50:22 PM 483 Views
Re: Agreed. And isn't people the plural for person? - 20/09/2012 07:41:36 PM 1000 Views
Tell me, honestly. - 20/09/2012 01:52:41 AM 1568 Views
Contractions - 20/09/2012 05:16:56 AM 1189 Views
Oh Terez, - 20/09/2012 05:36:23 AM 1250 Views
100% Death of Narg *NM* - 20/09/2012 06:03:06 AM 468 Views
Oh Terez... - 20/09/2012 09:07:32 AM 1134 Views
Yes, it's called disdain for trollery *NM* - 20/09/2012 09:12:21 AM 492 Views
Oh Terez, - 20/09/2012 04:29:52 PM 944 Views
That's ... actually not entirely correct. - 20/09/2012 06:53:03 AM 1270 Views
I did notice that on my reread - 20/09/2012 07:19:57 AM 1067 Views
It's how they're used and by whom - 20/09/2012 12:01:35 PM 1294 Views
Oh Cannoli, - 20/09/2012 05:26:34 AM 1151 Views

Reply to Message