Active Users:207 Time:01/03/2021 05:07:43 PM
Re: I think its a warding Tor Send a noteboard - 11/02/2013 01:35:04 PM
The warding is probably inverted, considering Taim can't see it. It's attuned to Demandred and if the flows are directed at him, the ward activates and kills the user. It could be similar to the ward Rand wove around Callandor, promising a nasty surprise to someone who tried to take it.


But then the question is, what does it mean that "the flows are directed at him"? Channeling in his general direction? That would be inconvenient if Taim was directing his flows towards somebody standing between him and Demandred. And how is the direction of channeling even determined? Many complex weaves consists of load of threads twisting around each other, pointing all over the place.
Fram kamerater!
Reply to message
Binding an angreal - 09/02/2013 05:35:19 PM 1480 Views
I thought Demandred was bluffing Taim - 09/02/2013 06:40:46 PM 848 Views
I got the impression that "binding" allowed Demandred to take control of the Power being Channeled - 10/02/2013 12:40:09 AM 960 Views
Re: I got the impression that "binding" allowed Demandred to take control of the Power being Chan... - 10/02/2013 07:52:59 PM 670 Views
Perhaps a booby trap type thing ... Or just a wording issue - 10/02/2013 10:58:53 PM 720 Views
I think its a warding - 11/02/2013 05:34:09 AM 797 Views
Re: I think its a warding - 11/02/2013 01:35:04 PM 926 Views
I didn't find it that odd - 10/02/2013 01:33:44 AM 836 Views
You stole my examples. Good job *NM* - 10/02/2013 04:54:32 AM 484 Views
Re: I didn't find it that odd - 10/02/2013 07:49:57 PM 908 Views
Re: I didn't find it that odd - 11/02/2013 05:55:22 AM 874 Views
Re: I didn't find it that odd - 11/02/2013 06:40:28 AM 659 Views
Re: I didn't find it that odd - 11/02/2013 01:30:30 PM 691 Views
Re: I didn't find it that odd - 11/02/2013 01:32:00 PM 688 Views
Taim should have immediatly destroyed sakarnen. - 12/02/2013 03:19:38 PM 728 Views
Re: Taim should have immediatly destroyed sakarnen. - 13/02/2013 05:01:12 AM 745 Views

Reply to Message