Active Users:1295 Time:28/10/2025 05:08:38 AM
Re: I think its a warding Tor Send a noteboard - 11/02/2013 01:35:04 PM
The warding is probably inverted, considering Taim can't see it. It's attuned to Demandred and if the flows are directed at him, the ward activates and kills the user. It could be similar to the ward Rand wove around Callandor, promising a nasty surprise to someone who tried to take it.


But then the question is, what does it mean that "the flows are directed at him"? Channeling in his general direction? That would be inconvenient if Taim was directing his flows towards somebody standing between him and Demandred. And how is the direction of channeling even determined? Many complex weaves consists of load of threads twisting around each other, pointing all over the place.
Fram kamerater!
Reply to message
Binding an angreal - 09/02/2013 05:35:19 PM 2339 Views
I thought Demandred was bluffing Taim - 09/02/2013 06:40:46 PM 1667 Views
I got the impression that "binding" allowed Demandred to take control of the Power being Channeled - 10/02/2013 12:40:09 AM 1809 Views
Re: I got the impression that "binding" allowed Demandred to take control of the Power being Chan... - 10/02/2013 07:52:59 PM 1467 Views
Perhaps a booby trap type thing ... Or just a wording issue - 10/02/2013 10:58:53 PM 1520 Views
I think its a warding - 11/02/2013 05:34:09 AM 1605 Views
Re: I think its a warding - 11/02/2013 01:35:04 PM 1945 Views
I didn't find it that odd - 10/02/2013 01:33:44 AM 1631 Views
You stole my examples. Good job *NM* - 10/02/2013 04:54:32 AM 900 Views
Re: I didn't find it that odd - 10/02/2013 07:49:57 PM 1755 Views
Re: I didn't find it that odd - 11/02/2013 05:55:22 AM 1745 Views
Re: I didn't find it that odd - 11/02/2013 06:40:28 AM 1436 Views
Re: I didn't find it that odd - 11/02/2013 01:30:30 PM 1506 Views
Re: I didn't find it that odd - 11/02/2013 01:32:00 PM 1459 Views
Taim should have immediatly destroyed sakarnen. - 12/02/2013 03:19:38 PM 1520 Views
Re: Taim should have immediatly destroyed sakarnen. - 13/02/2013 05:01:12 AM 1562 Views

Reply to Message