Active Users:1309 Time:03/02/2026 08:38:21 AM
Re: I think its a warding Tor Send a noteboard - 11/02/2013 01:35:04 PM
The warding is probably inverted, considering Taim can't see it. It's attuned to Demandred and if the flows are directed at him, the ward activates and kills the user. It could be similar to the ward Rand wove around Callandor, promising a nasty surprise to someone who tried to take it.


But then the question is, what does it mean that "the flows are directed at him"? Channeling in his general direction? That would be inconvenient if Taim was directing his flows towards somebody standing between him and Demandred. And how is the direction of channeling even determined? Many complex weaves consists of load of threads twisting around each other, pointing all over the place.
Fram kamerater!
Reply to message
Binding an angreal - 09/02/2013 05:35:19 PM 2427 Views
I thought Demandred was bluffing Taim - 09/02/2013 06:40:46 PM 1769 Views
I got the impression that "binding" allowed Demandred to take control of the Power being Channeled - 10/02/2013 12:40:09 AM 1901 Views
Re: I got the impression that "binding" allowed Demandred to take control of the Power being Chan... - 10/02/2013 07:52:59 PM 1557 Views
Perhaps a booby trap type thing ... Or just a wording issue - 10/02/2013 10:58:53 PM 1588 Views
I think its a warding - 11/02/2013 05:34:09 AM 1686 Views
Re: I think its a warding - 11/02/2013 01:35:04 PM 2035 Views
I didn't find it that odd - 10/02/2013 01:33:44 AM 1721 Views
You stole my examples. Good job *NM* - 10/02/2013 04:54:32 AM 933 Views
Re: I didn't find it that odd - 10/02/2013 07:49:57 PM 1844 Views
Re: I didn't find it that odd - 11/02/2013 05:55:22 AM 1843 Views
Re: I didn't find it that odd - 11/02/2013 06:40:28 AM 1505 Views
Re: I didn't find it that odd - 11/02/2013 01:30:30 PM 1574 Views
Re: I didn't find it that odd - 11/02/2013 01:32:00 PM 1547 Views
Taim should have immediatly destroyed sakarnen. - 12/02/2013 03:19:38 PM 1598 Views
Re: Taim should have immediatly destroyed sakarnen. - 13/02/2013 05:01:12 AM 1654 Views

Reply to Message