Active Users:426 Time:16/06/2025 11:37:50 AM
Why does anybody care? Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 18/01/2014 05:05:32 AM

I ignore things I don't like from canon all the time. It'd only be relevant if we were expecting some kind of sequel and wanted to make sure that material wasn't included, but given that this is a completed work, it doesn't change anything to anything.

The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Should the last three books be officially removed from Canon? - 17/01/2014 08:31:08 AM 1779 Views
The first six books were fantastic - 17/01/2014 07:22:28 PM 1158 Views
...this is dumb *NM* - 17/01/2014 08:55:32 PM 545 Views
+1 *NM* - 18/01/2014 03:56:32 PM 569 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/01/2014 07:50:30 PM 542 Views
+1 *NM* - 19/03/2014 04:17:18 AM 548 Views
The final post in the brief discussion there says it all. - 17/01/2014 09:59:17 PM 1317 Views
Why does anybody care? - 18/01/2014 05:05:32 AM 1345 Views
Or to put it another way, I agree with beetnemesis. *NM* - 18/01/2014 05:06:14 AM 702 Views
Dumb - 18/01/2014 01:53:42 PM 968 Views
I can see the argument, but in general, no. - 18/01/2014 08:37:43 PM 1106 Views
If anything, I think BS was more aware of Egwene's flaws - 20/01/2014 04:00:24 AM 1097 Views
That's Cannoli's point. - 21/01/2014 07:55:07 PM 951 Views
This just makes me sad all over again. - 19/01/2014 01:55:08 AM 1024 Views
I would remove the last few RJ books from Canon, before BS' trilogy..... - 20/01/2014 04:13:03 AM 1152 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/01/2014 07:50:14 PM 550 Views
Heartily agreed. *NM* - 29/01/2014 09:50:41 PM 568 Views
No, whatever most of the people here say - they're good! *NM* - 28/01/2014 05:44:49 AM 624 Views

Reply to Message