Active Users:554 Time:02/08/2025 04:55:30 PM
Why does anybody care? Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 18/01/2014 05:05:32 AM

I ignore things I don't like from canon all the time. It'd only be relevant if we were expecting some kind of sequel and wanted to make sure that material wasn't included, but given that this is a completed work, it doesn't change anything to anything.

The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Should the last three books be officially removed from Canon? - 17/01/2014 08:31:08 AM 1801 Views
The first six books were fantastic - 17/01/2014 07:22:28 PM 1188 Views
...this is dumb *NM* - 17/01/2014 08:55:32 PM 569 Views
+1 *NM* - 18/01/2014 03:56:32 PM 586 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/01/2014 07:50:30 PM 561 Views
+1 *NM* - 19/03/2014 04:17:18 AM 564 Views
The final post in the brief discussion there says it all. - 17/01/2014 09:59:17 PM 1348 Views
Why does anybody care? - 18/01/2014 05:05:32 AM 1380 Views
Or to put it another way, I agree with beetnemesis. *NM* - 18/01/2014 05:06:14 AM 725 Views
Dumb - 18/01/2014 01:53:42 PM 992 Views
I can see the argument, but in general, no. - 18/01/2014 08:37:43 PM 1128 Views
If anything, I think BS was more aware of Egwene's flaws - 20/01/2014 04:00:24 AM 1119 Views
That's Cannoli's point. - 21/01/2014 07:55:07 PM 974 Views
This just makes me sad all over again. - 19/01/2014 01:55:08 AM 1054 Views
I would remove the last few RJ books from Canon, before BS' trilogy..... - 20/01/2014 04:13:03 AM 1176 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/01/2014 07:50:14 PM 569 Views
Heartily agreed. *NM* - 29/01/2014 09:50:41 PM 586 Views
No, whatever most of the people here say - they're good! *NM* - 28/01/2014 05:44:49 AM 639 Views

Reply to Message