Active Users:564 Time:02/08/2025 04:53:24 PM
The very notion that any of the series was important enough to discuss this is absurd. Tom Send a noteboard - 29/01/2014 09:50:06 PM

Sanderson's works have every right to stand alongside the other books. It's clear that the first book he wrote was easily better than four or five of the Jordan books, and the other two were still better than at least three of them.

Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Should the last three books be officially removed from Canon? - 17/01/2014 08:31:08 AM 1801 Views
The first six books were fantastic - 17/01/2014 07:22:28 PM 1188 Views
...this is dumb *NM* - 17/01/2014 08:55:32 PM 569 Views
+1 *NM* - 18/01/2014 03:56:32 PM 586 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/01/2014 07:50:30 PM 560 Views
+1 *NM* - 19/03/2014 04:17:18 AM 564 Views
The final post in the brief discussion there says it all. - 17/01/2014 09:59:17 PM 1348 Views
Why does anybody care? - 18/01/2014 05:05:32 AM 1379 Views
Or to put it another way, I agree with beetnemesis. *NM* - 18/01/2014 05:06:14 AM 724 Views
Dumb - 18/01/2014 01:53:42 PM 992 Views
I can see the argument, but in general, no. - 18/01/2014 08:37:43 PM 1128 Views
If anything, I think BS was more aware of Egwene's flaws - 20/01/2014 04:00:24 AM 1118 Views
That's Cannoli's point. - 21/01/2014 07:55:07 PM 973 Views
This just makes me sad all over again. - 19/01/2014 01:55:08 AM 1054 Views
I would remove the last few RJ books from Canon, before BS' trilogy..... - 20/01/2014 04:13:03 AM 1175 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/01/2014 07:50:14 PM 568 Views
Heartily agreed. *NM* - 29/01/2014 09:50:41 PM 585 Views
No, whatever most of the people here say - they're good! *NM* - 28/01/2014 05:44:49 AM 639 Views
The very notion that any of the series was important enough to discuss this is absurd. - 29/01/2014 09:50:06 PM 1074 Views

Reply to Message