Active Users:486 Time:14/12/2025 10:50:32 PM
Some points fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 21/11/2015 06:58:17 PM

As Shannow said, we've discussed this quite a bit, so have a look at all that.

Some specific points:

1) Cadsuane, in some entries, is level 9, equalling Metarra, Bode and Nicola (Bode is a guess, but nothing else can possibly fit). In others, she is level 5. RJ changed his mind on her, but nothing in the books shows this. It appears Brandon was working under the assumption she was level 9, too.

2) Aviendha: Terez has confirmed that level 11 was only her current strength, not her potential. This is also Elayne's strength as of WH (she says Tamela was stronger than her, and the Companion says Tamela was level 10). Aviendha will be fully as strong as Egwene was, eventually.

3) Rahvin being strong as Ishamael is a surprise, but remember... this only emphasizes that actual OP strength is only one part of the story. Rahvin certainly wasn't as skilled as Demandred, Lanfear, Graendal, Semirhage and Moridin. Sammael may be in that list too, but those five, regardless of OP strength level, seem to be the best with the OP among the Forsaken.

Reply to message
Here you have it : the strength in the Power lists - 21/11/2015 01:23:58 PM 2341 Views
Some points - 21/11/2015 06:58:17 PM 1185 Views
Re: Some points - 21/11/2015 11:19:39 PM 1208 Views
Re: Some points - 22/11/2015 01:09:43 AM 1119 Views
Re: Some points - 22/11/2015 01:53:23 AM 1291 Views
No - 22/11/2015 03:31:30 AM 1095 Views
Re: Some points - 22/11/2015 03:09:35 AM 1519 Views
Re: Some points - 22/11/2015 02:55:30 AM 1107 Views
Re: Some points - 22/11/2015 03:34:04 AM 1117 Views
Should be 72 levels including the men - 21/11/2015 10:34:59 PM 1283 Views
Question about Forkroot... - 22/11/2015 01:07:18 AM 1139 Views
Re: Question about Forkroot... - 22/11/2015 01:09:51 AM 1201 Views
Question about Forkroot... - 22/11/2015 01:07:19 AM 1105 Views
Yikes - 22/11/2015 02:59:04 AM 1267 Views
Hopefully Dom will chime in here... - 22/11/2015 03:28:24 AM 1908 Views

Reply to Message