Active Users:476 Time:02/05/2025 03:56:01 PM
IMHO dexterity only ever seemed to BE an equalizer power-wise in head to head combat. Dunstan Send a noteboard - 23/10/2016 04:35:28 PM

View original post
The men don't really need to be obviously stronger than the women for the story to be told. In fact, aside from a handful of outliers I don't think RJ gave it much thought because he also considered dexterity as an equalizer. Not really a concept that would play all that well in a TV Show IMO. Might be really interesting to see something like that executed well. We'd really ONLY see effective Strength and many people may have a different view of the OP and "strength". Even make us see it in the way the AoL AS saw it.

As seemed to be why men were still considered to make better weapons. I mean, it might make the women "better" at some fine weaves, but when the goal is simply to keep throwing out the massive sheets of fire, or to just make gateway after gateway after gateway... What the channeler needs is the raw strength to be able to DO it in the first place.

Well... That and just gateways in and of themselves, and other "must be this strong to even use" weaves as well. Maybe it's just a small sample size, but it always seemed like a hell of a lot more Ashaman then Aes Sedai were powerful enough to Travel(like just ab out every Ashaman we ever saw)... Even outside of combat, Traveling is a pretty big freaking deal.

Reply to message
Gender in WoT - 19/10/2016 05:25:44 PM 1444 Views
Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 20/10/2016 01:30:05 PM 807 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 20/10/2016 04:46:54 PM 789 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 21/10/2016 11:28:14 AM 892 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 21/10/2016 12:44:08 PM 732 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 23/10/2016 12:32:14 AM 830 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 23/10/2016 08:43:57 PM 712 Views
Sanderson's fan service gay characters were a mistake - 20/10/2016 02:56:34 PM 917 Views
This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 03:50:37 PM 824 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 04:05:20 PM 792 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 06:24:43 PM 868 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 07:28:34 PM 752 Views
Since you don't seem to know what your opinion actually is - 21/10/2016 08:08:26 PM 720 Views
Re: Since you don't seem to know what your opinion actually is - 21/10/2016 08:30:31 PM 761 Views
That's an unfair assessment - 24/10/2016 04:13:45 AM 1007 Views
Re: That's an unfair assessment - 25/10/2016 12:41:51 AM 979 Views
Should have been more clear - 25/10/2016 02:34:41 AM 815 Views
Oh, yes, that's a good point then. - 01/11/2016 10:18:07 AM 768 Views
I agree - 01/11/2016 03:49:45 PM 886 Views
On f**king - 20/10/2016 04:28:31 PM 960 Views
Double post *NM* - 20/10/2016 04:33:11 PM 371 Views
Makes me wonder how they will handle if the produce a TV show - 23/10/2016 03:03:18 PM 924 Views
IMHO dexterity only ever seemed to BE an equalizer power-wise in head to head combat. - 23/10/2016 04:35:28 PM 887 Views

Reply to Message