Active Users:523 Time:03/11/2026 08:12:49 AM
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much kHz1000 Send a noteboard - 21/10/2016 04:05:20 PM

View original postBecause of this, putting in a gay man as a minor character seemed less like it was caving to PC pressure to "PUT A GAY MAN IN THE SERIES BECAUSE THEY SHOULD BE REPRESENTED" and more like a (rather late) attempt at more consistent world-building.

But it was, BS consciously decided he should place a gay guy in WoT to rectify RJ's perceived mishap. He expressely stated it was so. To me it came off as an unnecessary appendage in an otherwise organic story. Thank you, Mr Sanderson, but your alms are not necessary. And if some straight person found the lack of gay men problematic (God how I loath the word), well really, who cares what straight people think?
Reply to message
Gender in WoT - 19/10/2016 05:25:44 PM 1789 Views
Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 20/10/2016 01:30:05 PM 1146 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 20/10/2016 04:46:54 PM 1181 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 21/10/2016 11:28:14 AM 1230 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 21/10/2016 12:44:08 PM 1014 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 23/10/2016 12:32:14 AM 1176 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 23/10/2016 08:43:57 PM 1038 Views
Sanderson's fan service gay characters were a mistake - 20/10/2016 02:56:34 PM 1616 Views
It was wrong because sodomy is an abomination against the Light - 21/10/2016 11:04:08 AM 1166 Views
This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 03:50:37 PM 1161 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 04:05:20 PM 1122 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 06:24:43 PM 1206 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 07:28:34 PM 1069 Views
Since you don't seem to know what your opinion actually is - 21/10/2016 08:08:26 PM 1023 Views
Re: Since you don't seem to know what your opinion actually is - 21/10/2016 08:30:31 PM 1068 Views
That's an unfair assessment - 24/10/2016 04:13:45 AM 1413 Views
Re: That's an unfair assessment - 25/10/2016 12:41:51 AM 1278 Views
Should have been more clear - 25/10/2016 02:34:41 AM 1251 Views
Oh, yes, that's a good point then. - 01/11/2016 10:18:07 AM 1054 Views
I agree - 01/11/2016 03:49:45 PM 1322 Views
On f**king - 20/10/2016 04:28:31 PM 1248 Views
Double post *NM* - 20/10/2016 04:33:11 PM 506 Views
Makes me wonder how they will handle if the produce a TV show - 23/10/2016 03:03:18 PM 1336 Views

Reply to Message