Active Users:826 Time:08/09/2026 03:32:43 PM
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much kHz1000 Send a noteboard - 21/10/2016 04:05:20 PM

View original postBecause of this, putting in a gay man as a minor character seemed less like it was caving to PC pressure to "PUT A GAY MAN IN THE SERIES BECAUSE THEY SHOULD BE REPRESENTED" and more like a (rather late) attempt at more consistent world-building.

But it was, BS consciously decided he should place a gay guy in WoT to rectify RJ's perceived mishap. He expressely stated it was so. To me it came off as an unnecessary appendage in an otherwise organic story. Thank you, Mr Sanderson, but your alms are not necessary. And if some straight person found the lack of gay men problematic (God how I loath the word), well really, who cares what straight people think?
Reply to message
Gender in WoT - 19/10/2016 05:25:44 PM 1746 Views
Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 20/10/2016 01:30:05 PM 1110 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 20/10/2016 04:46:54 PM 1133 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 21/10/2016 11:28:14 AM 1197 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 21/10/2016 12:44:08 PM 980 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 23/10/2016 12:32:14 AM 1126 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 23/10/2016 08:43:57 PM 1004 Views
Sanderson's fan service gay characters were a mistake - 20/10/2016 02:56:34 PM 1516 Views
It was wrong because sodomy is an abomination against the Light - 21/10/2016 11:04:08 AM 1130 Views
This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 03:50:37 PM 1108 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 04:05:20 PM 1090 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 06:24:43 PM 1160 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 07:28:34 PM 1036 Views
Since you don't seem to know what your opinion actually is - 21/10/2016 08:08:26 PM 992 Views
Re: Since you don't seem to know what your opinion actually is - 21/10/2016 08:30:31 PM 1022 Views
That's an unfair assessment - 24/10/2016 04:13:45 AM 1370 Views
Re: That's an unfair assessment - 25/10/2016 12:41:51 AM 1247 Views
Should have been more clear - 25/10/2016 02:34:41 AM 1202 Views
Oh, yes, that's a good point then. - 01/11/2016 10:18:07 AM 1024 Views
I agree - 01/11/2016 03:49:45 PM 1285 Views
On f**king - 20/10/2016 04:28:31 PM 1222 Views
Double post *NM* - 20/10/2016 04:33:11 PM 491 Views

Reply to Message