Active Users:335 Time:17/05/2024 06:17:51 PM
The Real Red Herring Mat_Cauthon33 Send a noteboard - 07/10/2009 09:28:01 PM
"Taim's character also doesn't fit Be'lal's, e.g. Taim doesn't like swords.

I've always thought that was a red herring; after Be'lals remark to Rand about how "they" turned a game of swords into combat it would be pretty stupid to immediately appear a master swordsman as well as master channeler. In fact, if he used the sword much around Rand he'd HAVE to deliberately alter his style to avoid outing himself if he's Be'lal."

Wouldnt suddently introducing Taim as Be'lal after several books of giving proof he is dead be more of a red herring than Taim not wanting to use a sword in case Rand figures out he is Be'lal?
Reply to message
Dueling Theory II: Taim is Be'lal. - 07/10/2009 03:37:59 PM 973 Views
I've always found this to be a silly theory - 07/10/2009 03:49:53 PM 670 Views
Still like it though. - 07/10/2009 03:55:47 PM 487 Views
I hate it like I hate Gawyn - 07/10/2009 06:17:40 PM 544 Views
Wow. - 12/10/2009 04:44:27 AM 431 Views
Not possible - 07/10/2009 06:44:04 PM 465 Views
You replied in the wrong place *NM* - 07/10/2009 07:42:14 PM 198 Views
RJ actually indicated... - 10/10/2009 10:51:23 AM 425 Views
Nope... - 07/10/2009 04:09:52 PM 489 Views
Good points, but still not convinced. - 07/10/2009 04:19:42 PM 461 Views
The other Forsaken... - 07/10/2009 04:31:26 PM 470 Views
Except for mentions of the fellow pretending to be Sammael. - 07/10/2009 04:56:11 PM 697 Views
And why.. - 07/10/2009 05:25:30 PM 487 Views
The Real Red Herring - 07/10/2009 09:28:01 PM 555 Views
No, Taims disdain for swords is a red herring for RAND. - 12/10/2009 01:02:30 AM 493 Views
A few seconds is the same as a few hours, in this situation - 07/10/2009 11:05:25 PM 433 Views
Not at all. - 11/10/2009 11:59:14 PM 415 Views
timing doesn't fit - 08/10/2009 01:03:01 AM 437 Views
Re: timing doesn't fit - 12/10/2009 12:42:24 AM 444 Views
actually we know that's when they first come back - 12/10/2009 02:34:59 AM 520 Views

Reply to Message