Active Users:761 Time:16/07/2026 03:58:20 AM
The Real Red Herring Mat_Cauthon33 Send a noteboard - 07/10/2009 09:28:01 PM
"Taim's character also doesn't fit Be'lal's, e.g. Taim doesn't like swords.

I've always thought that was a red herring; after Be'lals remark to Rand about how "they" turned a game of swords into combat it would be pretty stupid to immediately appear a master swordsman as well as master channeler. In fact, if he used the sword much around Rand he'd HAVE to deliberately alter his style to avoid outing himself if he's Be'lal."

Wouldnt suddently introducing Taim as Be'lal after several books of giving proof he is dead be more of a red herring than Taim not wanting to use a sword in case Rand figures out he is Be'lal?
Reply to message
Dueling Theory II: Taim is Be'lal. - 07/10/2009 03:37:59 PM 1301 Views
I've always found this to be a silly theory - 07/10/2009 03:49:53 PM 1005 Views
Still like it though. - 07/10/2009 03:55:47 PM 825 Views
I hate it like I hate Gawyn - 07/10/2009 06:17:40 PM 849 Views
Wow. - 12/10/2009 04:44:27 AM 753 Views
Not possible - 07/10/2009 06:44:04 PM 797 Views
You replied in the wrong place *NM* - 07/10/2009 07:42:14 PM 337 Views
RJ actually indicated... - 10/10/2009 10:51:23 AM 745 Views
Nope... - 07/10/2009 04:09:52 PM 775 Views
Good points, but still not convinced. - 07/10/2009 04:19:42 PM 762 Views
The other Forsaken... - 07/10/2009 04:31:26 PM 783 Views
Except for mentions of the fellow pretending to be Sammael. - 07/10/2009 04:56:11 PM 1037 Views
And why.. - 07/10/2009 05:25:30 PM 794 Views
The Real Red Herring - 07/10/2009 09:28:01 PM 889 Views
No, Taims disdain for swords is a red herring for RAND. - 12/10/2009 01:02:30 AM 801 Views
A few seconds is the same as a few hours, in this situation - 07/10/2009 11:05:25 PM 771 Views
Not at all. - 11/10/2009 11:59:14 PM 728 Views
timing doesn't fit - 08/10/2009 01:03:01 AM 751 Views
Re: timing doesn't fit - 12/10/2009 12:42:24 AM 742 Views
actually we know that's when they first come back - 12/10/2009 02:34:59 AM 887 Views

Reply to Message