Active Users:513 Time:29/10/2026 05:03:51 PM
The Real Red Herring Mat_Cauthon33 Send a noteboard - 07/10/2009 09:28:01 PM
"Taim's character also doesn't fit Be'lal's, e.g. Taim doesn't like swords.

I've always thought that was a red herring; after Be'lals remark to Rand about how "they" turned a game of swords into combat it would be pretty stupid to immediately appear a master swordsman as well as master channeler. In fact, if he used the sword much around Rand he'd HAVE to deliberately alter his style to avoid outing himself if he's Be'lal."

Wouldnt suddently introducing Taim as Be'lal after several books of giving proof he is dead be more of a red herring than Taim not wanting to use a sword in case Rand figures out he is Be'lal?
Reply to message
Dueling Theory II: Taim is Be'lal. - 07/10/2009 03:37:59 PM 1373 Views
I've always found this to be a silly theory - 07/10/2009 03:49:53 PM 1084 Views
Still like it though. - 07/10/2009 03:55:47 PM 892 Views
I hate it like I hate Gawyn - 07/10/2009 06:17:40 PM 916 Views
Wow. - 12/10/2009 04:44:27 AM 831 Views
Not possible - 07/10/2009 06:44:04 PM 883 Views
You replied in the wrong place *NM* - 07/10/2009 07:42:14 PM 363 Views
RJ actually indicated... - 10/10/2009 10:51:23 AM 828 Views
Nope... - 07/10/2009 04:09:52 PM 838 Views
Good points, but still not convinced. - 07/10/2009 04:19:42 PM 842 Views
The other Forsaken... - 07/10/2009 04:31:26 PM 843 Views
Except for mentions of the fellow pretending to be Sammael. - 07/10/2009 04:56:11 PM 1104 Views
And why.. - 07/10/2009 05:25:30 PM 878 Views
The Real Red Herring - 07/10/2009 09:28:01 PM 968 Views
No, Taims disdain for swords is a red herring for RAND. - 12/10/2009 01:02:30 AM 874 Views
A few seconds is the same as a few hours, in this situation - 07/10/2009 11:05:25 PM 852 Views
Not at all. - 11/10/2009 11:59:14 PM 785 Views
timing doesn't fit - 08/10/2009 01:03:01 AM 830 Views
Re: timing doesn't fit - 12/10/2009 12:42:24 AM 800 Views
actually we know that's when they first come back - 12/10/2009 02:34:59 AM 971 Views

Reply to Message