Active Users:1011 Time:03/05/2026 03:08:05 PM
The Real Red Herring Mat_Cauthon33 Send a noteboard - 07/10/2009 09:28:01 PM
"Taim's character also doesn't fit Be'lal's, e.g. Taim doesn't like swords.

I've always thought that was a red herring; after Be'lals remark to Rand about how "they" turned a game of swords into combat it would be pretty stupid to immediately appear a master swordsman as well as master channeler. In fact, if he used the sword much around Rand he'd HAVE to deliberately alter his style to avoid outing himself if he's Be'lal."

Wouldnt suddently introducing Taim as Be'lal after several books of giving proof he is dead be more of a red herring than Taim not wanting to use a sword in case Rand figures out he is Be'lal?
Reply to message
Dueling Theory II: Taim is Be'lal. - 07/10/2009 03:37:59 PM 1252 Views
I've always found this to be a silly theory - 07/10/2009 03:49:53 PM 961 Views
Still like it though. - 07/10/2009 03:55:47 PM 777 Views
I hate it like I hate Gawyn - 07/10/2009 06:17:40 PM 813 Views
Wow. - 12/10/2009 04:44:27 AM 705 Views
Not possible - 07/10/2009 06:44:04 PM 752 Views
You replied in the wrong place *NM* - 07/10/2009 07:42:14 PM 312 Views
RJ actually indicated... - 10/10/2009 10:51:23 AM 695 Views
Nope... - 07/10/2009 04:09:52 PM 742 Views
Good points, but still not convinced. - 07/10/2009 04:19:42 PM 715 Views
The other Forsaken... - 07/10/2009 04:31:26 PM 744 Views
Except for mentions of the fellow pretending to be Sammael. - 07/10/2009 04:56:11 PM 989 Views
And why.. - 07/10/2009 05:25:30 PM 741 Views
The Real Red Herring - 07/10/2009 09:28:01 PM 840 Views
No, Taims disdain for swords is a red herring for RAND. - 12/10/2009 01:02:30 AM 764 Views
A few seconds is the same as a few hours, in this situation - 07/10/2009 11:05:25 PM 729 Views
Not at all. - 11/10/2009 11:59:14 PM 694 Views
timing doesn't fit - 08/10/2009 01:03:01 AM 712 Views
Re: timing doesn't fit - 12/10/2009 12:42:24 AM 696 Views
actually we know that's when they first come back - 12/10/2009 02:34:59 AM 837 Views

Reply to Message