Active Users:1309 Time:02/09/2026 02:19:34 PM
The Real Red Herring Mat_Cauthon33 Send a noteboard - 07/10/2009 09:28:01 PM
"Taim's character also doesn't fit Be'lal's, e.g. Taim doesn't like swords.

I've always thought that was a red herring; after Be'lals remark to Rand about how "they" turned a game of swords into combat it would be pretty stupid to immediately appear a master swordsman as well as master channeler. In fact, if he used the sword much around Rand he'd HAVE to deliberately alter his style to avoid outing himself if he's Be'lal."

Wouldnt suddently introducing Taim as Be'lal after several books of giving proof he is dead be more of a red herring than Taim not wanting to use a sword in case Rand figures out he is Be'lal?
Reply to message
Dueling Theory II: Taim is Be'lal. - 07/10/2009 03:37:59 PM 1335 Views
I've always found this to be a silly theory - 07/10/2009 03:49:53 PM 1051 Views
Still like it though. - 07/10/2009 03:55:47 PM 867 Views
I hate it like I hate Gawyn - 07/10/2009 06:17:40 PM 877 Views
Wow. - 12/10/2009 04:44:27 AM 791 Views
Not possible - 07/10/2009 06:44:04 PM 835 Views
You replied in the wrong place *NM* - 07/10/2009 07:42:14 PM 351 Views
RJ actually indicated... - 10/10/2009 10:51:23 AM 783 Views
Nope... - 07/10/2009 04:09:52 PM 808 Views
Good points, but still not convinced. - 07/10/2009 04:19:42 PM 803 Views
The other Forsaken... - 07/10/2009 04:31:26 PM 814 Views
Except for mentions of the fellow pretending to be Sammael. - 07/10/2009 04:56:11 PM 1068 Views
And why.. - 07/10/2009 05:25:30 PM 834 Views
The Real Red Herring - 07/10/2009 09:28:01 PM 925 Views
No, Taims disdain for swords is a red herring for RAND. - 12/10/2009 01:02:30 AM 840 Views
A few seconds is the same as a few hours, in this situation - 07/10/2009 11:05:25 PM 813 Views
Not at all. - 11/10/2009 11:59:14 PM 758 Views
timing doesn't fit - 08/10/2009 01:03:01 AM 791 Views
Re: timing doesn't fit - 12/10/2009 12:42:24 AM 775 Views
actually we know that's when they first come back - 12/10/2009 02:34:59 AM 920 Views

Reply to Message