Active Users:527 Time:16/07/2026 06:40:08 AM
A few seconds is the same as a few hours, in this situation beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 07/10/2009 11:05:25 PM
Bel'al's thread was burned backwards in the pattern, say by 10 seconds. That means that the DO would have had to "catch" Bel'al's life 10 seconds ago to ressurect him.

However, the DO didn't catch him, because 10 seconds ago, Bel'al wasn't dead!

It's paradox, which pops up whenever balefire enters into the equation.

You COULD make some sort of justification that the 10-seconds-ago Dark One would have saved Bel'al, thus making Bel'al reincarnated in the present, and it'd make more or less sense in some other series... but that's not how things work in WoT.
I amuse myself.
Reply to message
Dueling Theory II: Taim is Be'lal. - 07/10/2009 03:37:59 PM 1305 Views
I've always found this to be a silly theory - 07/10/2009 03:49:53 PM 1009 Views
Still like it though. - 07/10/2009 03:55:47 PM 829 Views
I hate it like I hate Gawyn - 07/10/2009 06:17:40 PM 852 Views
Wow. - 12/10/2009 04:44:27 AM 756 Views
Not possible - 07/10/2009 06:44:04 PM 802 Views
You replied in the wrong place *NM* - 07/10/2009 07:42:14 PM 338 Views
RJ actually indicated... - 10/10/2009 10:51:23 AM 752 Views
Nope... - 07/10/2009 04:09:52 PM 779 Views
Good points, but still not convinced. - 07/10/2009 04:19:42 PM 766 Views
The other Forsaken... - 07/10/2009 04:31:26 PM 786 Views
Except for mentions of the fellow pretending to be Sammael. - 07/10/2009 04:56:11 PM 1040 Views
And why.. - 07/10/2009 05:25:30 PM 799 Views
The Real Red Herring - 07/10/2009 09:28:01 PM 892 Views
No, Taims disdain for swords is a red herring for RAND. - 12/10/2009 01:02:30 AM 805 Views
A few seconds is the same as a few hours, in this situation - 07/10/2009 11:05:25 PM 775 Views
Not at all. - 11/10/2009 11:59:14 PM 732 Views
timing doesn't fit - 08/10/2009 01:03:01 AM 755 Views
Re: timing doesn't fit - 12/10/2009 12:42:24 AM 746 Views
actually we know that's when they first come back - 12/10/2009 02:34:59 AM 891 Views

Reply to Message