Active Users:1678 Time:16/07/2026 05:49:33 AM
A few seconds is the same as a few hours, in this situation beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 07/10/2009 11:05:25 PM
Bel'al's thread was burned backwards in the pattern, say by 10 seconds. That means that the DO would have had to "catch" Bel'al's life 10 seconds ago to ressurect him.

However, the DO didn't catch him, because 10 seconds ago, Bel'al wasn't dead!

It's paradox, which pops up whenever balefire enters into the equation.

You COULD make some sort of justification that the 10-seconds-ago Dark One would have saved Bel'al, thus making Bel'al reincarnated in the present, and it'd make more or less sense in some other series... but that's not how things work in WoT.
I amuse myself.
Reply to message
Dueling Theory II: Taim is Be'lal. - 07/10/2009 03:37:59 PM 1302 Views
I've always found this to be a silly theory - 07/10/2009 03:49:53 PM 1007 Views
Still like it though. - 07/10/2009 03:55:47 PM 827 Views
I hate it like I hate Gawyn - 07/10/2009 06:17:40 PM 850 Views
Wow. - 12/10/2009 04:44:27 AM 754 Views
Not possible - 07/10/2009 06:44:04 PM 799 Views
You replied in the wrong place *NM* - 07/10/2009 07:42:14 PM 338 Views
RJ actually indicated... - 10/10/2009 10:51:23 AM 748 Views
Nope... - 07/10/2009 04:09:52 PM 777 Views
Good points, but still not convinced. - 07/10/2009 04:19:42 PM 764 Views
The other Forsaken... - 07/10/2009 04:31:26 PM 784 Views
Except for mentions of the fellow pretending to be Sammael. - 07/10/2009 04:56:11 PM 1039 Views
And why.. - 07/10/2009 05:25:30 PM 796 Views
The Real Red Herring - 07/10/2009 09:28:01 PM 891 Views
No, Taims disdain for swords is a red herring for RAND. - 12/10/2009 01:02:30 AM 803 Views
A few seconds is the same as a few hours, in this situation - 07/10/2009 11:05:25 PM 774 Views
Not at all. - 11/10/2009 11:59:14 PM 730 Views
timing doesn't fit - 08/10/2009 01:03:01 AM 753 Views
Re: timing doesn't fit - 12/10/2009 12:42:24 AM 744 Views
actually we know that's when they first come back - 12/10/2009 02:34:59 AM 889 Views

Reply to Message