Active Users:386 Time:01/05/2025 06:06:07 PM
You have to understand... vandevere Send a noteboard - 31/08/2009 05:49:58 PM
So in TSR, Asmodean, in his alias, the Gleeman Nateel, performs what appears to be an epic song about Manetherin for the Aiel and company during their trip to Cold Rock Hold.

Here is my question: Is that really how he spent his time since being released from his 3000 year prison term? I mean Rahvin, Belal, Sammael and, to a lesser extent Graendal and Messana, have set themselves up as rulers of nations. Lanfear is spending her time shadowing Rand. Ishmael and Demandred have a number of schemes going on.

But apparently Asmodean has spent his time memorizing the details of epic poems/songs.


Asmo's an artiste...

If the human brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't understand it.
Reply to message
Asmodean: Idiot or Savant? - 31/08/2009 05:48:10 PM 1338 Views
You have to understand... - 31/08/2009 05:49:58 PM 952 Views
It's true--he was an artist first and foremost, and a Forsaken second - 31/08/2009 06:45:41 PM 1109 Views
Who are you calling an idiot?! *NM* - 31/08/2009 07:06:39 PM 385 Views
I don't think he's a powerful Forsaken - 31/08/2009 07:14:13 PM 967 Views
and yet, he survived - 31/08/2009 07:19:26 PM 816 Views
I agree and disagree - 31/08/2009 07:35:27 PM 1065 Views
Interesting, who were the six? - 31/08/2009 08:10:38 PM 845 Views
Re: Interesting, who were the six? - 31/08/2009 09:16:40 PM 810 Views
Yep - 31/08/2009 08:19:55 PM 810 Views
Re: Yep - 31/08/2009 09:27:33 PM 781 Views
Re: Yep - 03/11/2009 07:40:36 PM 742 Views
Re: Yep - 01/09/2009 06:13:15 AM 744 Views
Asmodean had a third name *NM* - 01/09/2009 01:59:07 PM 346 Views
Re: Asmodean had a third name - 04/09/2009 03:05:12 AM 702 Views
Actually that's not true - 02/09/2009 01:26:01 AM 730 Views
If he had reached Choedan Kal earlier that time... - 01/09/2009 02:29:29 AM 757 Views
I think he would have blasted Rand out of existence, but would have been culled. - 03/09/2009 06:55:12 PM 845 Views

Reply to Message