It wasn't Compulsion...Sanderson just sort of messed up IMO
Marshall Send a noteboard - 04/11/2009 11:38:38 PM
I believe this was supposed to be Rand trying to bend the Pattern to his will. He threatened to do this twice in the book--once to Cadsuane, and once to Graendal's spy, Kerb. If possible, I guess it might be a form of Compulsion--but the effects of ta'veren have always been different. Chance twists around Rand, and people have much looser tongues--but never because of a feeling of worship or necessity for the person to whom they are speaking. It always just happens. With Tuon, BS clearly put Tuon in a mindset where Rand's will was supreme, which mirrors Compulsion closely. But I can't honestly believe that Rand used Compulsion. For one, Nynaeve and Elayne--both of whom are very strong-willed, were absolutely no match for Lanfear's compulsion in the White Tower. A strong will such as Tuon's cannot resist Compulsion. Secondly, Rand is familiar with Compulsion, but he views it as a thing of evil as well, and I can't seeing him use it to further his gains. He's been in many situations in the past where Compulsion could have served him greatly, but he hasn't.
Is anyone angered by the Seanchan and a'dam?
- 30/10/2009 11:14:00 PM
1637 Views
Yes, but not me
- 30/10/2009 11:32:45 PM
912 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam
- 30/10/2009 11:39:45 PM
1028 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam
- 30/10/2009 11:45:29 PM
877 Views
Except the Seanchan are not spoiled chidlren who mistake "wishful thinking" for a plan
- 31/10/2009 04:48:45 AM
919 Views
Or he could have used the Choedan Kal
- 31/10/2009 12:21:42 PM
865 Views
What Choedan Kal? *NM*
- 31/10/2009 10:15:24 PM
351 Views
For what?
- 31/10/2009 12:03:57 AM
852 Views
if he was it wasn't on purpose. I think he was just actively trying to use his ta'verenness *NM*
- 31/10/2009 12:15:32 AM
357 Views
I dont think it's compulsion.
- 31/10/2009 12:16:00 AM
797 Views
Actually, I think it's the other way around.
- 31/10/2009 12:21:49 AM
773 Views
- 31/10/2009 12:21:49 AM
773 Views
It wasn't Compulsion...Sanderson just sort of messed up IMO
- 04/11/2009 11:38:38 PM
697 Views
I don't care for Tuon at all. I'd be okay if her and the Seanchan were obliterated. *NM*
- 31/10/2009 12:44:22 AM
348 Views
And how is that any different from me with Egwene (except she & I are the same race)? *NM*
- 31/10/2009 04:51:17 AM
355 Views
Why not Highlords in Tear?
- 31/10/2009 02:10:07 AM
887 Views
You dont really get it.
- 31/10/2009 12:23:35 PM
758 Views
Not at all. Their position is perfectly justified by their experiences.
- 31/10/2009 04:29:25 AM
855 Views
The a'dam and leashing of channelers does not change the fact that the OP can be misued...
- 31/10/2009 09:17:20 AM
853 Views
Which is why people should NOT be MORE angered toward Seanchan than toward WT.
- 31/10/2009 06:22:13 PM
736 Views
That's complete hogwash.
- 31/10/2009 10:23:50 PM
762 Views
Using the word "Hogwash" is inviting flames, but I will be nice about it
- 01/11/2009 05:44:16 AM
794 Views
Re: Using the word "Hogwash" is inviting flames, but I will be nice about it
- 05/11/2009 02:54:52 AM
1091 Views
Well that was rather silly.
- 31/10/2009 12:27:03 PM
704 Views
And a generation later, the same old problem arises. New channelers, with no one to stop them.
- 31/10/2009 10:28:35 PM
705 Views
Several valid points...
- 31/10/2009 05:17:09 PM
800 Views
I wonder what if Egwene happen to be a child kidnapped at Flame and sent to WT
- 31/10/2009 06:30:34 PM
790 Views
The sul'dam should be destroyed
- 31/10/2009 05:14:06 AM
743 Views
The people themselves shouldn't be.
- 31/10/2009 05:26:08 AM
750 Views
Only the Empress can remove the custom
- 31/10/2009 05:48:09 AM
736 Views
Due to their conditioning.
- 31/10/2009 06:03:32 AM
761 Views
She will
(and ya, sul'dam become sul'dam from age 13-18 usually) *NM*
- 31/10/2009 06:12:48 AM
357 Views
(and ya, sul'dam become sul'dam from age 13-18 usually) *NM*
- 31/10/2009 06:12:48 AM
357 Views
I think the a'dam is the perfect solution for Blacks and the Shaido 'Wise Ones'.
- 01/11/2009 02:51:27 AM
818 Views
