Active Users:626 Time:16/03/2026 02:01:41 PM
Rand + Avi + Elayne = Three Channelers. krassos Send a noteboard - 08/11/2009 05:59:34 PM
The Three become 0ne simply mean two female and one male channeler needed to use Callendor safely. Linking effectively transforms them into one single channeler, to the point that they can sense each other's emotions and so forth.

Min has nothing to do with it.
Reply to message
Min's riddle - 08/11/2009 02:45:09 PM 2379 Views
Re: Min's riddle - 08/11/2009 03:02:35 PM 1295 Views
Re: Min's riddle - 08/11/2009 03:20:53 PM 1155 Views
That third isn't so mysterious - 08/11/2009 04:45:31 PM 1185 Views
Many possibilities - 08/11/2009 03:36:34 PM 1119 Views
Min's riddle is perhaps solved - 08/11/2009 03:43:27 PM 1479 Views
wenches ? - 08/11/2009 04:51:19 PM 1172 Views
What do you prefer? Gals? - 08/11/2009 06:54:27 PM 1083 Views
This is still a really large leap in logic. - 08/11/2009 07:50:00 PM 1298 Views
Hmmm. Not agreeing or disagreeing...but Min had a "Melting" viewing before - 08/11/2009 08:34:36 PM 1200 Views
Three things... - 08/11/2009 08:40:37 PM 1458 Views
Soul mates - 08/11/2009 10:47:22 PM 1037 Views
Re: Soul mates - 08/11/2009 11:29:24 PM 1020 Views
Uh...Hello...Ilyena...Elayne...see any similarity? - 09/11/2009 05:37:45 AM 1074 Views
You have some far-out theories and seem to think I’m retarded for not thinking the same - 09/11/2009 10:16:51 AM 1097 Views
I didn't "seem" to think it until now. I was AGREEING with you. - 09/11/2009 03:02:15 PM 936 Views
I don't see how when I disagree with about everything you said - 09/11/2009 11:40:19 PM 910 Views
Eh, there's no evidence of that, other than an abundance of vowels in their name. - 10/11/2009 06:49:58 AM 947 Views
Melting of , and will keep the curve intact *NM* - 10/11/2009 11:07:42 AM 661 Views
Answer to Crackbranded Asha' man: Where has it ever been shown that Taim is gay? - 09/11/2009 06:25:42 PM 1406 Views
... - 10/11/2009 06:56:34 AM 1161 Views
Re: ... - 10/11/2009 10:42:51 AM 1043 Views
Aren't you the guy who just jumped on him for - 26/12/2009 11:20:45 PM 1056 Views
So... everyone pointing out how terrible this theory is in your original post hasn't disuaded you? - 09/11/2009 04:47:25 AM 1001 Views
Re: So... everyone pointing out how terrible this theory is ... - 10/11/2009 12:03:02 PM 1024 Views
Well, actually- yes! The LTT/Rand thing IS creepy. - 10/11/2009 04:33:02 PM 1270 Views
Re: Well, actually- yes! The LTT/Rand thing IS creepy. - 11/11/2009 04:30:28 PM 1224 Views
As you said, the first half of your post is irrelevant - 11/11/2009 06:56:07 PM 1014 Views
Channelling sickness, pregnancy-induced difficulty with weaving... - 08/11/2009 03:53:26 PM 1067 Views
I believe Elayne will be busy giving birth - 08/11/2009 04:47:33 PM 984 Views
Uh...no. The three are Rand, Aviendha and Elayne - 08/11/2009 05:18:04 PM 1150 Views
Eh. It's likely, but not definite. Don't get so sassy. - 09/11/2009 04:53:08 AM 949 Views
Rand + Avi + Elayne = Three Channelers. - 08/11/2009 05:59:34 PM 931 Views
Do you think, that channeling is cool? - 08/11/2009 07:46:18 PM 1074 Views
Re: Do you think, that channeling is cool? - 08/11/2009 08:39:32 PM 1076 Views
Too simple and obvious. *NM* - 08/11/2009 07:56:05 PM 509 Views
Re: Min's riddle - 08/11/2009 09:24:11 PM 1201 Views
It's a possibility. - 09/11/2009 04:59:33 AM 1444 Views
I can see this as a definite possibility - 09/11/2009 10:12:23 PM 951 Views
Re: I can see this as a definite possibility - 10/11/2009 12:20:48 AM 1196 Views
It'd be more like David knocking out Goliath by making him punch himself in the face - 10/11/2009 06:58:16 AM 1017 Views
So why... - 10/11/2009 10:14:38 AM 869 Views
The Dark One is sentient; the CK is just a tool *NM* - 10/11/2009 04:33:52 PM 452 Views
sentient, not omnipotent - 10/11/2009 08:08:10 PM 889 Views
Re: Min's riddle - 09/11/2009 04:41:39 PM 972 Views
True, that is one of Min's visions - 10/11/2009 06:59:53 AM 909 Views
What about Rand as Moridin with Cyndy & Moggy? *NM* - 10/11/2009 12:23:58 PM 457 Views
Many possibilities. - 15/11/2009 06:12:55 PM 883 Views

Reply to Message