Active Users:336 Time:17/06/2025 04:56:47 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I could have sprayed TheCrownless Send a noteboard - 12/11/2009 02:28:41 PM
Bad Counterstrike player style.
Come to the dark side, We have candy!

I'm Israel, he's Palestine, its more fun when you pick sides.
Reply to message
Sanderson's understanding of angreal is totally wrong... Shannow - 12/11/2009 11:10:57 AM 1695 Views
You should include quotes TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 11:42:20 AM 879 Views
The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle. Shannow - 12/11/2009 11:57:20 AM 940 Views
Re: The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle. Watcher - 12/11/2009 12:37:46 PM 868 Views
Sure, I agree... Shannow - 12/11/2009 12:45:33 PM 804 Views
Re: The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle. TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 02:27:41 PM 842 Views
Please elaborate... Shannow - 12/11/2009 02:42:17 PM 830 Views
On the basis that we dont agree on the use of sa'angreals on a group. TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 03:02:29 PM 794 Views
OK, I'll humour you. This once. Shannow - 12/11/2009 05:18:57 PM 823 Views
How generous of you. TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 07:51:54 PM 899 Views
Scrap that TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 08:32:36 PM 805 Views
Rand Balefires a whole castle Insomdeon - 12/11/2009 01:10:05 PM 981 Views
There is no basis for that conclusion... Shannow - 12/11/2009 02:02:37 PM 850 Views
I could have sprayed TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 02:28:41 PM 810 Views
Ever notice the "sa" in sa'angreal? fionwe1987 - 12/11/2009 03:09:30 PM 948 Views
It stands for Super Amazing. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 12/11/2009 04:10:02 PM 369 Views
I was under the assumption it was super awesome but oh well. *NM* Blaine - 13/11/2009 06:08:36 AM 423 Views
There's never been any indication that sa'angreal work through a different mechanism to angreal... Shannow - 12/11/2009 04:51:13 PM 887 Views
It has always been a viable theory, and Sanderson seems convincing...EDIT: RJ's take fionwe1987 - 12/11/2009 08:21:17 PM 872 Views
Wrong place *ignore* Sidious - 12/11/2009 08:45:32 PM 773 Views
Do you still stick by the exponential theory? TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 08:52:31 PM 752 Views
I do *NM* Sidious - 12/11/2009 09:05:56 PM 330 Views
Good, 'cos it's bloody good. *NM* TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 10:56:30 PM 352 Views
Re: Wrong place *ignore* taura-tierno - 27/12/2009 06:14:51 PM 791 Views
sa'angreal and angreal are only different in terms of the magnitude of their effects *NM* Marshall - 12/11/2009 06:56:43 PM 369 Views
Re: Ever notice the "sa" in sa'angreal? TheUltimateReality - 12/11/2009 07:48:37 PM 847 Views
You are missing two important points PatAtt - 12/11/2009 05:09:35 PM 988 Views
Response to both points... Shannow - 12/11/2009 05:57:11 PM 875 Views
In fact, I've just read the actual report, and Sanderson didn't say anything near what you quoted. Shannow - 12/11/2009 06:06:39 PM 758 Views
Re: Look at how similar descriptions of angreal and Sa'angreal affects are in the books. Tedtheman - 12/11/2009 07:34:16 PM 811 Views
I completely agree with you Shannow Marshall - 12/11/2009 07:01:29 PM 782 Views
Sidious' "One Power Dynamics" Corwin - 12/11/2009 08:10:41 PM 1258 Views
Oh, also Corwin - 12/11/2009 08:15:56 PM 826 Views
As long as you reference him, I doubt he'd mind. *NM* Marshall - 12/11/2009 08:36:59 PM 361 Views
there's a slight problem with your theory Jim - 12/11/2009 08:19:25 PM 722 Views
Probably Sidious - 12/11/2009 09:05:31 PM 1152 Views
Agreed, with one point Marshall - 12/11/2009 09:25:09 PM 759 Views
Some ways the fixed amount theory could work... fionwe1987 - 13/11/2009 12:33:04 AM 769 Views
There is an argument for a minimum strength argument in the Great Hunt Ryan - 13/11/2009 03:26:11 AM 796 Views
Re: Some ways the fixed amount theory could work... Tedtheman - 13/11/2009 07:00:15 PM 671 Views
Re: Sanderson's understanding of angreal is totally wrong... Tedtheman - 13/11/2009 07:11:34 PM 774 Views
Yes it's also been mentioned before in earlier books BlackAdder - 19/11/2009 12:51:51 AM 709 Views
Re: Yes it's also been mentioned before in earlier books taura-tierno - 27/12/2009 06:37:47 PM 734 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes