Active Users:369 Time:06/11/2025 07:03:39 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
It stands for Super Amazing. *NM* TaskmasterJack Send a noteboard - 12/11/2009 04:10:02 PM
Reply to message
Sanderson's understanding of angreal is totally wrong... Shannow - 12/11/2009 11:10:57 AM 1770 Views
You should include quotes TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 11:42:20 AM 933 Views
The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle. Shannow - 12/11/2009 11:57:20 AM 1004 Views
Re: The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle. Watcher - 12/11/2009 12:37:46 PM 922 Views
Sure, I agree... Shannow - 12/11/2009 12:45:33 PM 865 Views
Re: The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle. TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 02:27:41 PM 904 Views
Please elaborate... Shannow - 12/11/2009 02:42:17 PM 887 Views
On the basis that we dont agree on the use of sa'angreals on a group. TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 03:02:29 PM 865 Views
OK, I'll humour you. This once. Shannow - 12/11/2009 05:18:57 PM 891 Views
How generous of you. TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 07:51:54 PM 975 Views
Scrap that TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 08:32:36 PM 862 Views
Rand Balefires a whole castle Insomdeon - 12/11/2009 01:10:05 PM 1037 Views
There is no basis for that conclusion... Shannow - 12/11/2009 02:02:37 PM 912 Views
I could have sprayed TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 02:28:41 PM 880 Views
Ever notice the "sa" in sa'angreal? fionwe1987 - 12/11/2009 03:09:30 PM 1016 Views
It stands for Super Amazing. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 12/11/2009 04:10:02 PM 402 Views
I was under the assumption it was super awesome but oh well. *NM* Blaine - 13/11/2009 06:08:36 AM 457 Views
There's never been any indication that sa'angreal work through a different mechanism to angreal... Shannow - 12/11/2009 04:51:13 PM 971 Views
It has always been a viable theory, and Sanderson seems convincing...EDIT: RJ's take fionwe1987 - 12/11/2009 08:21:17 PM 960 Views
Wrong place *ignore* Sidious - 12/11/2009 08:45:32 PM 851 Views
Do you still stick by the exponential theory? TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 08:52:31 PM 816 Views
I do *NM* Sidious - 12/11/2009 09:05:56 PM 362 Views
Good, 'cos it's bloody good. *NM* TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 10:56:30 PM 385 Views
Re: Wrong place *ignore* taura-tierno - 27/12/2009 06:14:51 PM 856 Views
sa'angreal and angreal are only different in terms of the magnitude of their effects *NM* Marshall - 12/11/2009 06:56:43 PM 400 Views
Re: Ever notice the "sa" in sa'angreal? TheUltimateReality - 12/11/2009 07:48:37 PM 896 Views
You are missing two important points PatAtt - 12/11/2009 05:09:35 PM 1063 Views
Response to both points... Shannow - 12/11/2009 05:57:11 PM 944 Views
In fact, I've just read the actual report, and Sanderson didn't say anything near what you quoted. Shannow - 12/11/2009 06:06:39 PM 814 Views
Re: Look at how similar descriptions of angreal and Sa'angreal affects are in the books. Tedtheman - 12/11/2009 07:34:16 PM 879 Views
I completely agree with you Shannow Marshall - 12/11/2009 07:01:29 PM 841 Views
Sidious' "One Power Dynamics" Corwin - 12/11/2009 08:10:41 PM 1338 Views
Oh, also Corwin - 12/11/2009 08:15:56 PM 889 Views
As long as you reference him, I doubt he'd mind. *NM* Marshall - 12/11/2009 08:36:59 PM 395 Views
there's a slight problem with your theory Jim - 12/11/2009 08:19:25 PM 780 Views
Probably Sidious - 12/11/2009 09:05:31 PM 1223 Views
Agreed, with one point Marshall - 12/11/2009 09:25:09 PM 810 Views
Some ways the fixed amount theory could work... fionwe1987 - 13/11/2009 12:33:04 AM 844 Views
There is an argument for a minimum strength argument in the Great Hunt Ryan - 13/11/2009 03:26:11 AM 857 Views
Re: Some ways the fixed amount theory could work... Tedtheman - 13/11/2009 07:00:15 PM 750 Views
Re: Sanderson's understanding of angreal is totally wrong... Tedtheman - 13/11/2009 07:11:34 PM 855 Views
Yes it's also been mentioned before in earlier books BlackAdder - 19/11/2009 12:51:51 AM 770 Views
Re: Yes it's also been mentioned before in earlier books taura-tierno - 27/12/2009 06:37:47 PM 795 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Formatting
Smiley Codes