Active Users:410 Time:06/07/2025 05:06:35 PM
Brandon actually talked about that. TaskmasterJack Send a noteboard - 12/11/2009 06:33:32 PM
He says that he occasionally lets a character get something a little bit wrong if he feels that it's in-character for the character to do so. He says he gets complaints that the continuity is wrong or that he messed something up, but he feels it adds realism to the characters if they occasionally screw up the facts.
Reply to message
Has Sanderson changed how Balefire works? - 12/11/2009 12:05:56 PM 1077 Views
Re: Has Sanderson changed how Balefire works? - 12/11/2009 12:19:10 PM 885 Views
Well that's not how RJ understood it... - 12/11/2009 12:22:26 PM 712 Views
When Balefired your Thread is burnt backwards through the pattern - 12/11/2009 01:04:36 PM 746 Views
The capitals in your quote made me *NM* - 12/11/2009 02:36:56 PM 236 Views
Re: Well that's not how RJ understood it... - 12/11/2009 05:51:10 PM 599 Views
Sanderson understands it the same as you do. - 12/11/2009 01:45:19 PM 737 Views
And the PoV trap - 12/11/2009 05:13:40 PM 665 Views
Brandon actually talked about that. - 12/11/2009 06:33:32 PM 670 Views
Whoever said this in the book was wrong - 12/11/2009 05:20:52 PM 601 Views
Re: Soul Pool - 12/11/2009 06:12:09 PM 614 Views
RJ called it once... - 12/11/2009 06:37:43 PM 586 Views
Yet another change to how baelfire works - 12/11/2009 07:50:49 PM 648 Views
Did this cause a sheep to lose it's wool? *NM* - 12/11/2009 10:51:18 PM 225 Views

Reply to Message