Active Users:354 Time:06/11/2025 08:59:48 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I do *NM* Sidious Send a noteboard - 12/11/2009 09:05:56 PM
Because for me thats still the best explanation I've seen on how they work.
Seems to explain how the smaller the angreal the more benefit it offers to the stronger channeler, while something like the CK varies by next to nothing for those strong enough to channel it.

Thats what I was trying to get at with my 'X' + multiplier suggestion, but yours works better mathematically.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Reply to message
Sanderson's understanding of angreal is totally wrong... Shannow - 12/11/2009 11:10:57 AM 1770 Views
You should include quotes TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 11:42:20 AM 933 Views
The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle. Shannow - 12/11/2009 11:57:20 AM 1004 Views
Re: The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle. Watcher - 12/11/2009 12:37:46 PM 922 Views
Sure, I agree... Shannow - 12/11/2009 12:45:33 PM 865 Views
Re: The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle. TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 02:27:41 PM 904 Views
Please elaborate... Shannow - 12/11/2009 02:42:17 PM 887 Views
On the basis that we dont agree on the use of sa'angreals on a group. TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 03:02:29 PM 865 Views
OK, I'll humour you. This once. Shannow - 12/11/2009 05:18:57 PM 891 Views
How generous of you. TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 07:51:54 PM 976 Views
Scrap that TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 08:32:36 PM 862 Views
Rand Balefires a whole castle Insomdeon - 12/11/2009 01:10:05 PM 1037 Views
There is no basis for that conclusion... Shannow - 12/11/2009 02:02:37 PM 912 Views
I could have sprayed TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 02:28:41 PM 881 Views
Ever notice the "sa" in sa'angreal? fionwe1987 - 12/11/2009 03:09:30 PM 1017 Views
It stands for Super Amazing. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 12/11/2009 04:10:02 PM 402 Views
I was under the assumption it was super awesome but oh well. *NM* Blaine - 13/11/2009 06:08:36 AM 457 Views
There's never been any indication that sa'angreal work through a different mechanism to angreal... Shannow - 12/11/2009 04:51:13 PM 972 Views
It has always been a viable theory, and Sanderson seems convincing...EDIT: RJ's take fionwe1987 - 12/11/2009 08:21:17 PM 960 Views
Wrong place *ignore* Sidious - 12/11/2009 08:45:32 PM 851 Views
Do you still stick by the exponential theory? TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 08:52:31 PM 816 Views
I do *NM* Sidious - 12/11/2009 09:05:56 PM 363 Views
Good, 'cos it's bloody good. *NM* TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 10:56:30 PM 385 Views
Re: Wrong place *ignore* taura-tierno - 27/12/2009 06:14:51 PM 857 Views
sa'angreal and angreal are only different in terms of the magnitude of their effects *NM* Marshall - 12/11/2009 06:56:43 PM 400 Views
Re: Ever notice the "sa" in sa'angreal? TheUltimateReality - 12/11/2009 07:48:37 PM 897 Views
You are missing two important points PatAtt - 12/11/2009 05:09:35 PM 1063 Views
Response to both points... Shannow - 12/11/2009 05:57:11 PM 944 Views
In fact, I've just read the actual report, and Sanderson didn't say anything near what you quoted. Shannow - 12/11/2009 06:06:39 PM 814 Views
Re: Look at how similar descriptions of angreal and Sa'angreal affects are in the books. Tedtheman - 12/11/2009 07:34:16 PM 879 Views
I completely agree with you Shannow Marshall - 12/11/2009 07:01:29 PM 841 Views
Sidious' "One Power Dynamics" Corwin - 12/11/2009 08:10:41 PM 1340 Views
Oh, also Corwin - 12/11/2009 08:15:56 PM 889 Views
As long as you reference him, I doubt he'd mind. *NM* Marshall - 12/11/2009 08:36:59 PM 395 Views
there's a slight problem with your theory Jim - 12/11/2009 08:19:25 PM 780 Views
Probably Sidious - 12/11/2009 09:05:31 PM 1224 Views
Agreed, with one point Marshall - 12/11/2009 09:25:09 PM 811 Views
Some ways the fixed amount theory could work... fionwe1987 - 13/11/2009 12:33:04 AM 845 Views
There is an argument for a minimum strength argument in the Great Hunt Ryan - 13/11/2009 03:26:11 AM 857 Views
Re: Some ways the fixed amount theory could work... Tedtheman - 13/11/2009 07:00:15 PM 750 Views
Re: Sanderson's understanding of angreal is totally wrong... Tedtheman - 13/11/2009 07:11:34 PM 855 Views
Yes it's also been mentioned before in earlier books BlackAdder - 19/11/2009 12:51:51 AM 770 Views
Re: Yes it's also been mentioned before in earlier books taura-tierno - 27/12/2009 06:37:47 PM 795 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Formatting
Smiley Codes