Active Users:625 Time:04/08/2025 03:13:37 AM
There is an argument for a minimum strength argument in the Great Hunt Ryan Send a noteboard - 13/11/2009 03:26:11 AM
Verin is discussing the two sa'angreal with Ingtar in Cairhien. Here is the relevent quote.

"What? Oh, there is no need for that, I think. The two must be used in unison to handle enough of the One Power to Break the World - that was the way in the Age of Legends; a man and a woman working together were always ten times as strong as they were apart - and what Aes Sedai today would aid a man in channeling?
One by itself is powerful enough, but I can think of few women strong enough to survive the flow through the one on Tremalking. The Amyrlin, of course. Moiraine, and Elaida. Perhaps one or two others. And three still in training. As for Logain, it would have taken all his strength simply to keep from being burned to a cinder, with nothing left for doing anything. No, Ingtar, I don't think you need worry. At least, not until the real Dragon Reborn proclaims himself, and then we will all have enough to worry about as it is. Let us worry now about what we shall do when we are inside Barthanes's manor."
The past is just that, the past. You can only truly live by looking to the future!
Reply to message
Sanderson's understanding of angreal is totally wrong... - 12/11/2009 11:10:57 AM 1708 Views
You should include quotes - 12/11/2009 11:42:20 AM 890 Views
The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle. - 12/11/2009 11:57:20 AM 952 Views
Re: The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle. - 12/11/2009 12:37:46 PM 879 Views
Sure, I agree... - 12/11/2009 12:45:33 PM 816 Views
Re: The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle. - 12/11/2009 02:27:41 PM 853 Views
Please elaborate... - 12/11/2009 02:42:17 PM 842 Views
On the basis that we dont agree on the use of sa'angreals on a group. - 12/11/2009 03:02:29 PM 808 Views
OK, I'll humour you. This once. - 12/11/2009 05:18:57 PM 836 Views
How generous of you. - 12/11/2009 07:51:54 PM 914 Views
Scrap that - 12/11/2009 08:32:36 PM 816 Views
Rand Balefires a whole castle - 12/11/2009 01:10:05 PM 991 Views
There is no basis for that conclusion... - 12/11/2009 02:02:37 PM 863 Views
I could have sprayed - 12/11/2009 02:28:41 PM 820 Views
Ever notice the "sa" in sa'angreal? - 12/11/2009 03:09:30 PM 959 Views
It stands for Super Amazing. *NM* - 12/11/2009 04:10:02 PM 377 Views
I was under the assumption it was super awesome but oh well. *NM* - 13/11/2009 06:08:36 AM 431 Views
There's never been any indication that sa'angreal work through a different mechanism to angreal... - 12/11/2009 04:51:13 PM 899 Views
It has always been a viable theory, and Sanderson seems convincing...EDIT: RJ's take - 12/11/2009 08:21:17 PM 888 Views
Wrong place *ignore* - 12/11/2009 08:45:32 PM 785 Views
Do you still stick by the exponential theory? - 12/11/2009 08:52:31 PM 762 Views
I do *NM* - 12/11/2009 09:05:56 PM 337 Views
Good, 'cos it's bloody good. *NM* - 12/11/2009 10:56:30 PM 359 Views
Re: Wrong place *ignore* - 27/12/2009 06:14:51 PM 807 Views
Re: Ever notice the "sa" in sa'angreal? - 12/11/2009 07:48:37 PM 857 Views
You are missing two important points - 12/11/2009 05:09:35 PM 1004 Views
I completely agree with you Shannow - 12/11/2009 07:01:29 PM 793 Views
Sidious' "One Power Dynamics" - 12/11/2009 08:10:41 PM 1275 Views
Oh, also - 12/11/2009 08:15:56 PM 839 Views
As long as you reference him, I doubt he'd mind. *NM* - 12/11/2009 08:36:59 PM 368 Views
there's a slight problem with your theory - 12/11/2009 08:19:25 PM 732 Views
Probably - 12/11/2009 09:05:31 PM 1162 Views
Agreed, with one point - 12/11/2009 09:25:09 PM 771 Views
Some ways the fixed amount theory could work... - 13/11/2009 12:33:04 AM 782 Views
There is an argument for a minimum strength argument in the Great Hunt - 13/11/2009 03:26:11 AM 809 Views
Re: Some ways the fixed amount theory could work... - 13/11/2009 07:00:15 PM 683 Views
Re: Sanderson's understanding of angreal is totally wrong... - 13/11/2009 07:11:34 PM 792 Views
Yes it's also been mentioned before in earlier books - 19/11/2009 12:51:51 AM 722 Views
Re: Yes it's also been mentioned before in earlier books - 27/12/2009 06:37:47 PM 750 Views

Reply to Message