Active Users:477 Time:07/05/2025 11:22:38 AM
Well, yeah. I agree with that. *NM* BlackAdder Send a noteboard - 19/11/2009 08:22:34 PM
Two things come to mind, that I don't think the Rebels/Egwenists/War Hawks can defend.

1. Did Egwene and the Rebels cause Elaida's downfall?

2. Did Egwene and the Rebels expedite Elaida's downfall?

I don't see any way that anyone can truthfully answer "yes" to either question.

For 1) I think it is is a mix of Elaida's own undoing and ultimately the Seanchan death blow.
For 2) there is nothing. Nothing that Egwene and the Rebels did caused sped up the process in any way.

So... what exactly did the whole side-plot accomplish? Even if Egwene and the Rebels had just went along and conceded, Elaida would still have been captured in her sleep, at exactly the same moment.

Seems like a rather lengthy aside to to put a specific person (Egwene) on the Amyrlin's Seat.


When Rand went to meet Tuon, he tried very hard to "force" her into a truce. (Recall how he threatened to turn the Pattern to his will and kill Cadsuane earlier? ) Rand was trying to do just that very thing to get Tuon to comply.

However, through her own force of will, Tuon resisted, and thus set the stage for the Seanchan raid on the WT that ultimately put Egwene on the Amyrlin Seat. Say what you want, but the Pattern demanded that result and it got it.
This message last edited by BlackAdder on 19/11/2009 at 08:22:46 PM
Reply to message
The more I think about it (Egwene and the Rebels) - 19/11/2009 08:07:50 PM 1256 Views
The Pattern "willed" it. - 19/11/2009 08:18:56 PM 602 Views
Well, yeah. I agree with that. *NM* - 19/11/2009 08:22:34 PM 456 Views
I don't really agree. - 19/11/2009 08:22:20 PM 1340 Views
What I'm saying is - 19/11/2009 08:31:11 PM 557 Views
Not really, no. - 19/11/2009 09:02:29 PM 585 Views
Yet - 19/11/2009 08:33:23 PM 522 Views
Re: Yet - 19/11/2009 08:35:37 PM 519 Views
Re: Yet - 29/11/2009 06:56:40 AM 477 Views
I take it that was a reply to BlackAdder... *NM* - 19/11/2009 09:04:32 PM 226 Views
Assume there was no Rebellion - 19/11/2009 10:06:28 PM 589 Views
Right. Even if that does not answer his question. *NM* - 19/11/2009 10:11:21 PM 194 Views
Sorry, I forgot to address that... - 19/11/2009 10:20:57 PM 557 Views
Re: Assume there was no Rebellion - 29/11/2009 06:12:00 AM 474 Views
Couldn't be more wrong - delete this evidence-less thread - 21/11/2009 06:36:35 PM 517 Views
OK...? - 21/11/2009 10:16:43 PM 476 Views
You made the assertion, it's not my responsibility to disprove you, - 22/11/2009 04:35:14 PM 480 Views
Re: The more I think about it (Egwene and the Rebels) - 01/12/2009 01:42:13 AM 647 Views
Re: The more I think about it (Egwene and the Rebels) - 01/12/2009 01:43:19 AM 512 Views
Wow... - 01/12/2009 11:37:27 PM 504 Views
Egwene could've done most of what she did without screentime. *NM* - 19/12/2009 07:30:14 PM 192 Views

Reply to Message