So she's obviously allowed to make an incorrect statement if she finds it to be wryly amusing.
She also dismisses some nobles by saying they wish, "to depart and ponder civility," or something similar. It was quite obvious they didn't wish to leave and ponder civility. But she was capable of saying it.
Of course, she could be a Black Ajah.
The BA Hunters and their methodology (tGS spoilers)
19/11/2009 02:16:20 PM
- 933 Views
It probably has to be a direct betrayal
19/11/2009 02:53:19 PM
- 722 Views
Yup, totally.
19/11/2009 05:45:45 PM
- 625 Views
Possible reason for the loophole
19/11/2009 06:04:12 PM
- 673 Views
Re: Possible reason for the loophole
19/11/2009 06:36:21 PM
- 657 Views
Could be in that moment
19/11/2009 09:04:59 PM
- 576 Views
But the DO had Rand's mother - don't think she was a DF *NM*
21/11/2009 06:43:17 PM
- 277 Views
Could have been an illusion. We really know nothing of what happens to souls
24/12/2009 08:14:05 PM
- 523 Views
Re: It probably has to be a direct betrayal
19/11/2009 06:41:03 PM
- 664 Views
But wasn't Talene *forced* to do that?
19/11/2009 08:05:48 PM
- 687 Views
That and any oath on the Oath Rod relies very heavily on the swearer's interpretation of the oath.
19/11/2009 07:30:55 PM
- 583 Views
True. There's a scene where Cadsuane is told about Aiel in the city and she says "I hadn't noticed."
19/11/2009 08:21:52 PM
- 691 Views
Unless she's Black Ajah
Just kidding.
19/11/2009 08:59:49 PM
- 587 Views

Maybe that's the real reason she's now taken to wearing a black hood!
*NM*
19/11/2009 09:02:06 PM
- 229 Views

There's reason to believe that if any AS removed the Oaths from themselves, it's Cadsuane. *NM*
01/12/2009 04:44:00 PM
- 239 Views
Bigger loophole
21/11/2009 06:46:42 PM
- 604 Views
True, but again perspective seems to determine what is a lie and what isn't
21/11/2009 10:19:19 PM
- 513 Views