Active Users:464 Time:07/05/2025 11:17:39 AM
Re: Assume there was no Rebellion darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 29/11/2009 06:12:00 AM
Also, Nynaeve, Egwene and Elayne would not have been Aes Sedai. This means no Bowl of the Winds, which means the world would have been in severe drought at this time. This also means that there could have been interference with the Cleansing.


Without this event there would probably never have been a Seanchan attack either... no Bowl of the Winds Channeling and the Seanchan would never have thought the AS had a secret weapon.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
The more I think about it (Egwene and the Rebels) - 19/11/2009 08:07:50 PM 1256 Views
The Pattern "willed" it. - 19/11/2009 08:18:56 PM 602 Views
Well, yeah. I agree with that. *NM* - 19/11/2009 08:22:34 PM 455 Views
I don't really agree. - 19/11/2009 08:22:20 PM 1340 Views
What I'm saying is - 19/11/2009 08:31:11 PM 557 Views
Not really, no. - 19/11/2009 09:02:29 PM 585 Views
Yet - 19/11/2009 08:33:23 PM 522 Views
Re: Yet - 19/11/2009 08:35:37 PM 519 Views
Re: Yet - 29/11/2009 06:56:40 AM 477 Views
I take it that was a reply to BlackAdder... *NM* - 19/11/2009 09:04:32 PM 226 Views
Assume there was no Rebellion - 19/11/2009 10:06:28 PM 589 Views
Right. Even if that does not answer his question. *NM* - 19/11/2009 10:11:21 PM 194 Views
Sorry, I forgot to address that... - 19/11/2009 10:20:57 PM 557 Views
Re: Assume there was no Rebellion - 29/11/2009 06:12:00 AM 474 Views
Couldn't be more wrong - delete this evidence-less thread - 21/11/2009 06:36:35 PM 517 Views
OK...? - 21/11/2009 10:16:43 PM 475 Views
You made the assertion, it's not my responsibility to disprove you, - 22/11/2009 04:35:14 PM 480 Views
Re: The more I think about it (Egwene and the Rebels) - 01/12/2009 01:42:13 AM 647 Views
Re: The more I think about it (Egwene and the Rebels) - 01/12/2009 01:43:19 AM 512 Views
Wow... - 01/12/2009 11:37:27 PM 504 Views
Egwene could've done most of what she did without screentime. *NM* - 19/12/2009 07:30:14 PM 192 Views

Reply to Message