Active Users:187 Time:19/05/2024 03:21:51 AM
it was implied he used a particularly strong balefire moondog Send a noteboard - 29/11/2009 08:06:10 AM
I was reading TGS and i came across the part where Semirhage has Rand collared. She uses it to have Rand choke Min, but then Semirhage was balefired by Rand and the True Power. So why, if she is balefired do the bruises remain on her neck? I understand her and Rand would remember it but if Semirhage is balefired would the marks on Min's neck not disappear?


Maybe he only balefired her a few seconds out of the pattern... if he'd gone any further back he would have undone the whole scene!


i've been wondering the same question actually. my only guess is that it's due to the fact rand used the TP instead of the OP. maybe there's a difference in how much gets "reset" between balefire between the powers?
"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa

"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
Reply to message
A small something - 29/11/2009 05:04:28 AM 911 Views
Re: A small something - 29/11/2009 05:16:28 AM 564 Views
it was implied he used a particularly strong balefire - 29/11/2009 08:06:10 AM 679 Views
Sermihage just got a whipcord of balefire - 29/11/2009 03:53:23 PM 634 Views
Why would he (or 98% of WoT readers) want that? *NM* - 29/11/2009 05:37:34 AM 207 Views
Maybe because it was done with the True Power ? *NM* - 29/11/2009 06:10:26 AM 191 Views
I just thought it was a continuity error *NM* - 29/11/2009 08:14:25 AM 201 Views
The simplest explanation ... - 29/11/2009 09:24:55 AM 595 Views
That's Really the Only Way Balefire Is Plausible. - 29/11/2009 11:10:15 AM 597 Views
Nice catch - 29/11/2009 03:28:56 PM 458 Views
Ramshalan - 29/11/2009 07:24:59 PM 453 Views
BS explained it on his tour... - 29/11/2009 11:23:18 AM 616 Views
Re: BS explained it on his tour... - 29/11/2009 08:39:07 PM 510 Views
Are we sure? - 29/11/2009 09:14:45 PM 574 Views

Reply to Message