Active Users:303 Time:10/05/2024 12:45:33 AM
That's Really the Only Way Balefire Is Plausible. The Name With No Man Send a noteboard - 29/11/2009 11:10:15 AM
... is that removing her from the Pattern would only remove things that Semhirage did directly. It was Rand's physical hands that caused the bruises, not Semhirage's.

The Graendal example illustrates this as well. When Graendal was destroyed by balefire, the thing that she caused directly -- Compulsion on whatshisface -- was undone. But the indirect things were not. If things that Graendal had indirectly caused had been undone as well, then whatshisface would never have come walking back to Rand.

Otherwise you have a ripple effect since very few actions occur in a vacuum. If balefire undoes not only what the target has done, but anything someone else did because of the targets actions, and anything yet more people did because of what those others did... I know it's supposed to have a powerful effect on the Pattern, but that would probably unravel it the first time balefire was used.
Reply to message
A small something - 29/11/2009 05:04:28 AM 911 Views
Re: A small something - 29/11/2009 05:16:28 AM 564 Views
it was implied he used a particularly strong balefire - 29/11/2009 08:06:10 AM 678 Views
Sermihage just got a whipcord of balefire - 29/11/2009 03:53:23 PM 634 Views
Why would he (or 98% of WoT readers) want that? *NM* - 29/11/2009 05:37:34 AM 206 Views
Maybe because it was done with the True Power ? *NM* - 29/11/2009 06:10:26 AM 189 Views
I just thought it was a continuity error *NM* - 29/11/2009 08:14:25 AM 201 Views
The simplest explanation ... - 29/11/2009 09:24:55 AM 595 Views
That's Really the Only Way Balefire Is Plausible. - 29/11/2009 11:10:15 AM 597 Views
Nice catch - 29/11/2009 03:28:56 PM 456 Views
Ramshalan - 29/11/2009 07:24:59 PM 453 Views
BS explained it on his tour... - 29/11/2009 11:23:18 AM 616 Views
Re: BS explained it on his tour... - 29/11/2009 08:39:07 PM 509 Views
Are we sure? - 29/11/2009 09:14:45 PM 573 Views

Reply to Message