Active Users:166 Time:18/05/2024 11:23:13 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Obviously artois Send a noteboard - 01/12/2009 09:45:32 PM
Obviously the question that should be asked is "Are you one of the Chosen of the Great Lord?" (Assuming Mesaana has had to swear on the oath rod to keep up her disguise)

The Forsaken do not see themselves as Forsaken, Black Ajah, Darkfriends, but as Chosen of the Great Lord. Another question one could ask, considering the Forsaken's general distain for White Tower Aes Sedai, would be "Are you an Aes Sedai of the White Tower?" Judging from the reactions of Lanfear and Moghiedien, Mesaana would have to answer 'no' unless she has literally taken the body of an Aes Sedai.
Reply to message
Mesaana was easily able to get past the Oath Rod. Tansu Targli - 01/12/2009 09:35:07 PM 1154 Views
Obviously artois - 01/12/2009 09:45:32 PM 698 Views
I'm not convinced. I don't believe she'd want to subject herself to being sworn. lord-of-shadow - 01/12/2009 09:54:40 PM 678 Views
Not just that, but in the AoL, the Oath Rod was used to "bind criminals". *NM* Lord Haart - 02/12/2009 05:41:35 AM 247 Views
It might even kill her Sidious - 04/12/2009 11:59:37 AM 423 Views
Didn't Sanderson say as much? *NM* Tom - 01/12/2009 10:06:56 PM 231 Views
I don't know what Sanderson may have said. *NM* Tansu Targli - 01/12/2009 10:13:58 PM 216 Views
I thought... artois - 01/12/2009 10:11:45 PM 506 Views
To be honest, though, any Sister can defeat the Three Oaths. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 01/12/2009 10:37:29 PM 532 Views
Re: To be honest, though, any Sister can defeat the Three Oaths. Tansu Targli - 01/12/2009 10:42:51 PM 521 Views
shaido still have it moondog - 02/12/2009 02:32:25 AM 568 Views
Well, that's just one oath. The other two are not as easy to circumvent. BlackAdder - 02/12/2009 01:19:53 AM 620 Views
But given free will, they can interpret "danger" to mean "clear and present" or "potential danger" RugbyPlayingAshaman - 02/12/2009 04:54:26 PM 446 Views
Last defense of life cannot mean potential danger. *NM* fionwe1987 - 02/12/2009 05:51:27 PM 188 Views
Yes it can. It all depends on interpretation. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 03/12/2009 12:22:47 AM 448 Views
Ummm, what? fionwe1987 - 03/12/2009 02:23:08 AM 383 Views
Re: Ummm, what? RugbyPlayingAshaman - 03/12/2009 11:15:20 PM 403 Views
None of this is a twisting of the Oaths. Her actions stick to the letter of the Oaths. fionwe1987 - 04/12/2009 04:29:44 AM 515 Views
Moiraine wasn't worried about getting around the Oaths Sidious - 04/12/2009 04:41:04 AM 426 Views
Here's a couple quotes from BS Light in the Night - 01/12/2009 11:57:16 PM 551 Views
Trouble is that would put a person into stasis Ryan - 02/12/2009 04:14:31 AM 424 Views
It only has to be maintained long enough to take the Oaths. *NM* Light in the Night - 02/12/2009 04:51:34 AM 198 Views
Eh, from what we've seen, Keepings don't really work like that beetnemesis - 02/12/2009 06:42:19 AM 569 Views
Probably just needs to be modified a bit Light in the Night - 02/12/2009 07:36:41 AM 548 Views
Keepers are for channellers, and are see through. Great Lord of Chaos - 02/12/2009 09:59:17 AM 423 Views
Turn off the Rod balefried - 02/12/2009 09:52:39 PM 540 Views
Does the bonded person do the channeling? Onarishma - 03/12/2009 05:52:09 AM 422 Views
....it is a physical requirement so "gloves" it is Onarishma - 03/12/2009 06:58:55 AM 1002 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes