We have 2 major WoT societies where the channelers
darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 10/12/2009 12:15:58 AM
I realize that you and Cannoli would love for all channelers to run around unhampered by any oath at all, but in such a world the various channeling factions would either rule totally (maybe fighting one another using their pathetic non channeling slaves as pawns), or piss off the non channelers so much that they invent some sort of device to enslave channelers (or kill them all).
The AoL was a world evolved too over AGES. I feel confidant that the reason the world was so peaceful is that in previous ages such conflicts as I describe were so horrible that channelers finally became some sort of benevolent rulers like something out of Plato.
The AoL was a world evolved too over AGES. I feel confidant that the reason the world was so peaceful is that in previous ages such conflicts as I describe were so horrible that channelers finally became some sort of benevolent rulers like something out of Plato.
are unbound and are valued members of their societies. Then there is also the Kin who the common folk seem to respect and who do not go out of their way to rule anything.
AS are the problem because they have set themselves up as a pseudo-religious political entity and actively seek power. Which explains both the high % of BA and the generally declining numbers. People don't trust AS and so fewer women seek to become AS. Note that as soon as the AS changed some of their elitist rules flocks of women came looking.
It's not the ability to Channel that makes these women douchebags, it's the AS system... which clearly needs to change!
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
The Empress and the oath rod
- 09/12/2009 07:25:36 PM
1192 Views
wishful thinking if you ask me. The point is "freedom" from leashes. Having the take oaths is worse. *NM*
- 09/12/2009 07:46:35 PM
314 Views
I think we already know Egwene's position on a "Fourth Oath"
- 09/12/2009 08:17:11 PM
960 Views
I'd rather see them keep the a'dam, and just leash all the current sul'dam
- 18/12/2009 03:04:22 AM
863 Views
Fortuona didn't save Egwene and a Fourth Oath to an Empress is worse than what Elaida wanted.
- 09/12/2009 08:18:17 PM
733 Views
True, but...
- 09/12/2009 10:02:13 PM
676 Views
So you advocate slavery?
- 09/12/2009 11:12:29 PM
673 Views
C'mon!
- 09/12/2009 11:43:44 PM
697 Views
The "Binder" is another form of Slavery.
- 09/12/2009 11:54:51 PM
677 Views
Re: The "Binder" is another form of Slavery.
- 10/12/2009 12:09:31 AM
754 Views
We have 2 major WoT societies where the channelers
- 10/12/2009 12:15:58 AM
658 Views
Don't be so quick to judge these two societies yet.
- 10/12/2009 05:06:33 AM
745 Views
*NM*
yet both groups hold highly influential positions within their societies without being shunned *NM*
- 10/12/2009 06:31:15 AM
297 Views
I don't know about being 'quick' - we've had at least 8 books to become familiar with the cultures
- 11/12/2009 03:18:32 PM
781 Views
I am thinking about straight oath without WT training.
- 09/12/2009 09:04:15 PM
789 Views
Or you could look to the organizations which have no "Binding" and no DFs
- 09/12/2009 11:17:18 PM
633 Views
Re: Or you could look to the organizations which have no "Binding" and no DFs
- 10/12/2009 12:00:03 AM
675 Views
I agree that there is no way the Seanchan are going to be able to change overnight
- 10/12/2009 12:12:00 AM
629 Views
I am sure that there are Blue Blood damane
- 10/12/2009 12:24:41 AM
631 Views
*NM*
I agree.
- 10/12/2009 12:48:23 AM
641 Views
Of course not!
- 10/12/2009 01:13:10 AM
653 Views
When did Tuon save Egwene ? *NM*
- 10/12/2009 11:49:29 AM
293 Views
It refers to part of Egwene's dream that is yet unfulfilled. It COULD mean Tuon save her. *NM*
- 10/12/2009 03:46:15 PM
288 Views