Active Users:831 Time:14/09/2026 11:42:57 AM
Well, I think RJ knew who was BA and not BA by then. Great Lord of Chaos Send a noteboard - 16/12/2009 12:21:22 AM
Probably as some sort of eventual irony, but then, for Rand, Verin was the only Aes Sedai he was familiar with, and had travelled with, save Moiraine. Alviarin was someone rather unknown to Rand, and with all that sucking up in her letter, mistrusted. Moiraine just chose an Aes Sedai Rand knew to make the comparison. It wouldn't have done to say "Trust Nacelle as much as you trust Alviarin." simply because Rand doesn't know who Nacelle is and isn't familiar with her.
Ὦ ξεῖν', ἀγγέλλειν Λακεδαιμονίοις ὅτι τῇδε
κείμεθα, τοῖς κείνων ῥήμασι πειθόμενοι.
Reply to message
Verin..(spoilers) - 15/12/2009 05:36:22 PM 1413 Views
In hindsight, it was really obvious. - 15/12/2009 05:57:41 PM 963 Views
Re: In hindsight, it was really obvious. - 15/12/2009 06:39:50 PM 926 Views
According to her own admission - 15/12/2009 07:35:21 PM 893 Views
Yes, apparently she did lie after all... - 15/12/2009 06:06:04 PM 969 Views
Re: Yes, apparently she did lie after all... - 15/12/2009 06:50:33 PM 921 Views
I'm glad you were able to be kind-of/sort-of right! - 15/12/2009 09:52:48 PM 871 Views
or not so completely wrong! hehe *NM* - 15/12/2009 10:31:53 PM 363 Views
Nothing like the sweet taste of being kind of half right!!! *NM* - 16/12/2009 12:11:49 AM 351 Views
Moiraine's warning - 15/12/2009 11:51:06 PM 960 Views
Re: Moiraine's warning - 16/12/2009 12:19:05 AM 859 Views
Well, I think RJ knew who was BA and not BA by then. - 16/12/2009 12:21:22 AM 839 Views
Re: Well, I think RJ knew who was BA and not BA by then. - 16/12/2009 12:29:10 AM 788 Views
Yes, I think so. - 16/12/2009 03:15:51 PM 732 Views
I always thought Verin lied. Most people thought it was obvious. *shrugs* *NM* - 16/12/2009 01:50:49 AM 346 Views
I'm still not sure! - 16/12/2009 06:07:35 AM 845 Views
Speaking of which.... - 16/12/2009 06:25:01 AM 828 Views
Yeah, but that's later, as you noted. - 16/12/2009 09:05:54 AM 781 Views

Reply to Message