Active Users:753 Time:12/08/2026 04:26:40 AM
The culling theory... Phelix Send a noteboard - 18/12/2009 09:36:34 PM
Cadsuane tells us that when she was younger, there were more women of her strength level, but by NS, they'd begun to die off (or were killed). She says that there are a few women who are close to her in the "modern" generation, but they are few and the women below them are much more common.

This points to the general decline of the strength of Aes Sedai in the White Tower. We know that channelers are not growing weaker in general, but the Tower is for some reason.

I think that the culling theory makes sense, but not from the angle the Aes Sedai are thinking of it. They claim removing men from the gene pool has caused the decline in strength. I think, rather, that by removing a significant portion of the channeling women from the same areas generation after generation, and not adding to the subsequent generations by reproducing, the Aes Sedai have weakened the pool of potential candidates.

This is not to say that I agree that the curve should be set at 50%... I just wanted to point out a mechanism that the Tower is using that reduces the strength of their sisters in general.
I was Phelix on wotmania, I will always be Phelix in the "real" world, and now I am Phelix on RAFO.

You will make all kinds of mistakes; but as long as you are generous and true and also fierce you cannot hurt the world or even seriously distress her.- Churchill

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
The One Power Bell Curve: Proof that it is not centered on 50% of the strongest channeler's strength - 18/12/2009 08:37:55 AM 1822 Views
I always thought the curve was one sided - 18/12/2009 01:17:32 PM 1099 Views
I would say that your sample is flawed. - 18/12/2009 05:02:02 PM 1203 Views
well said *NM* - 18/12/2009 05:12:40 PM 572 Views
It doesn't matter... - 18/12/2009 10:02:38 PM 1033 Views
But, it sort of does. - 18/12/2009 10:43:08 PM 1108 Views
So you're saying that no modern Aes Sedai are even of average strength? - 18/12/2009 10:51:01 PM 1261 Views
Are you sure it's the same bell curve from the AoL? - 18/12/2009 11:11:19 PM 1158 Views
The Tower is restricted to the middle... - 18/12/2009 05:35:03 PM 1239 Views
Two things... - 18/12/2009 09:28:25 PM 1125 Views
The culling theory... - 18/12/2009 09:36:34 PM 1048 Views
The culling theory applies to the ENTIRE population, not just Aes Sedai... - 18/12/2009 09:42:31 PM 1181 Views
Yes, but Aes Sedai take it to a new level... - 18/12/2009 09:48:59 PM 1258 Views
Re: Yes, but Aes Sedai take it to a new level... - 18/12/2009 10:06:15 PM 1024 Views
Several more things... - 18/12/2009 11:26:19 PM 1200 Views
You don't understand your own model... - 18/12/2009 11:38:05 PM 1235 Views
So RJ was wrong about Bell Curve distribution? - 19/12/2009 06:03:24 PM 1074 Views
Re: So RJ was wrong about Bell Curve distribution? - 19/12/2009 06:10:52 PM 1074 Views
Its simple really... - 19/12/2009 06:15:23 PM 1130 Views
Age-Related Sample Bias - 18/12/2009 06:41:03 PM 1057 Views
I have no problem with that...but it implies that the average woman today isn't at 50% of Lanfear... - 18/12/2009 09:46:00 PM 1163 Views
Partially agreed... - 18/12/2009 10:13:46 PM 1063 Views
A thought that occured to me, and I'd like your opinion... - 18/12/2009 07:38:29 PM 1050 Views
Well Sharina isn't a sparker and she's the strongest AS - 18/12/2009 07:57:17 PM 1072 Views
Yes... - 18/12/2009 08:01:57 PM 1170 Views
Is it just my bad memory or is one of the wondergirls not a sparker? - 18/12/2009 10:12:59 PM 1033 Views
I think it's just a bad memory... - 18/12/2009 10:19:25 PM 1026 Views
Easier sulution, and real example. - 18/12/2009 10:03:20 PM 1121 Views
And that is indeed the solution I feel most comfortable with... - 18/12/2009 10:08:40 PM 1063 Views
Re: And that is indeed the solution I feel most comfortable with... - 19/12/2009 11:39:31 AM 1305 Views
Agree, but a little more curvy is better - 19/12/2009 11:17:16 PM 999 Views
*facepalm* - 18/12/2009 10:13:16 PM 1084 Views
That's just the normalized value graphed on a log scale. - 19/12/2009 11:20:41 PM 1040 Views
Dude, Seriously? - 18/12/2009 10:19:25 PM 1061 Views
Indeed, and that's why I propose that... - 18/12/2009 10:31:23 PM 1106 Views
Yes, "Bell Curve" does not mean Gausian. Or normal distribution. - 19/12/2009 11:24:10 PM 1072 Views
It does to RJ - 20/12/2009 03:12:30 PM 1133 Views
Yes, "Bell Curve" does not mean Gausian. Or normal distribution. - 19/12/2009 11:24:11 PM 1029 Views
That's because outliers in IQ tests are excluded form the curve. *NM* - 18/12/2009 11:31:23 PM 591 Views
Really?!?! then what is the definition of a IQ of 200? - 19/12/2009 11:28:18 PM 1347 Views
You can have IQ's above that... - 20/12/2009 05:09:44 AM 1081 Views
I said that in the other post and was half torn to pieces *NM* - 19/12/2009 11:38:25 AM 529 Views
Eh. Ignore the IQ value and draw it on a linear weight scale - 19/12/2009 11:26:23 PM 1046 Views
Re: The One Power Bell Curve: Proof that it is not centered on 50% of the strongest channeler's stre - 19/12/2009 06:02:34 PM 1007 Views
I like this idea - 20/12/2009 04:01:28 PM 1296 Views
Accidental Post *NM* - 20/12/2009 07:11:09 PM 577 Views
Mathmatically this is very close to the system I proposed in another thread - 27/12/2009 01:23:51 AM 990 Views
Re: The One Power Bell Curve: - 27/12/2009 10:05:33 PM 1193 Views
What makes you think Alviarin is "middling"? - 27/12/2009 10:28:13 PM 1379 Views
Re: What makes you think Alviarin is "middling"? - 28/12/2009 03:19:14 PM 1071 Views
Re: What makes you think Alviarin is "middling"? - 28/12/2009 03:30:44 PM 1280 Views

Reply to Message