Active Users:1494 Time:24/12/2025 10:57:23 AM
Partially agreed... Shadowkiller Send a noteboard - 18/12/2009 10:13:46 PM
Perhaps the distribution would be more Gaussian (bell-shaped) when you consider the whole possible population of channelers rather than just the AS. This is purely speculative, but since in the AoL every possible channeler was found and trained to potential, then perhaps the strength distribution would have been perfectly Gaussian in the AoL.


And the evidence in the books clearly show that the average Aes Sedai isn't close to 50% as strong as the strongest woman.

Heck, the average Aes Sedai is shown to be less than 50% as strong as Egwene.

So I am perfectly happy to accept a perfect Bell Curve in the Age of Legends. But that wouldn't apply to modern channelers.

I agree with you that the Aes Sedai are not distributed around 50%.

I do not agree, at least not from the evidence I've seen, that if you included all modern channelers the distribution would still not be at 50% mean. I think to make a proper survey you would need to count all potential channelers who have never been trained, all Sea Folk, all damane, and any other channeling groups I've forgotten.

(Note 1: I tried to make this point in my first post, but I think bringing up the AoL was a distraction.
Note 2: My count is highly speculative, but I'm not saying this distribution is true, merely possible.)

So to reiterate, if you're only arguing about AS, then I agree. They are, on average, pretty weak. If you're expanding the argument to all female channelers of the Age, then I'm not so sure.
Reply to message
The One Power Bell Curve: Proof that it is not centered on 50% of the strongest channeler's strength - 18/12/2009 08:37:55 AM 1645 Views
I always thought the curve was one sided - 18/12/2009 01:17:32 PM 948 Views
I would say that your sample is flawed. - 18/12/2009 05:02:02 PM 1043 Views
well said *NM* - 18/12/2009 05:12:40 PM 493 Views
It doesn't matter... - 18/12/2009 10:02:38 PM 883 Views
But, it sort of does. - 18/12/2009 10:43:08 PM 954 Views
So you're saying that no modern Aes Sedai are even of average strength? - 18/12/2009 10:51:01 PM 1088 Views
Are you sure it's the same bell curve from the AoL? - 18/12/2009 11:11:19 PM 1013 Views
The Tower is restricted to the middle... - 18/12/2009 05:35:03 PM 1102 Views
Two things... - 18/12/2009 09:28:25 PM 964 Views
The culling theory... - 18/12/2009 09:36:34 PM 893 Views
The culling theory applies to the ENTIRE population, not just Aes Sedai... - 18/12/2009 09:42:31 PM 1017 Views
Yes, but Aes Sedai take it to a new level... - 18/12/2009 09:48:59 PM 1107 Views
Re: Yes, but Aes Sedai take it to a new level... - 18/12/2009 10:06:15 PM 877 Views
Several more things... - 18/12/2009 11:26:19 PM 1049 Views
You don't understand your own model... - 18/12/2009 11:38:05 PM 1069 Views
So RJ was wrong about Bell Curve distribution? - 19/12/2009 06:03:24 PM 937 Views
Re: So RJ was wrong about Bell Curve distribution? - 19/12/2009 06:10:52 PM 930 Views
Its simple really... - 19/12/2009 06:15:23 PM 972 Views
Age-Related Sample Bias - 18/12/2009 06:41:03 PM 905 Views
I have no problem with that...but it implies that the average woman today isn't at 50% of Lanfear... - 18/12/2009 09:46:00 PM 1025 Views
Partially agreed... - 18/12/2009 10:13:46 PM 914 Views
A thought that occured to me, and I'd like your opinion... - 18/12/2009 07:38:29 PM 900 Views
Well Sharina isn't a sparker and she's the strongest AS - 18/12/2009 07:57:17 PM 914 Views
Yes... - 18/12/2009 08:01:57 PM 1014 Views
Is it just my bad memory or is one of the wondergirls not a sparker? - 18/12/2009 10:12:59 PM 891 Views
I think it's just a bad memory... - 18/12/2009 10:19:25 PM 891 Views
Easier sulution, and real example. - 18/12/2009 10:03:20 PM 975 Views
And that is indeed the solution I feel most comfortable with... - 18/12/2009 10:08:40 PM 930 Views
Re: And that is indeed the solution I feel most comfortable with... - 19/12/2009 11:39:31 AM 1162 Views
Agree, but a little more curvy is better - 19/12/2009 11:17:16 PM 857 Views
*facepalm* - 18/12/2009 10:13:16 PM 929 Views
That's just the normalized value graphed on a log scale. - 19/12/2009 11:20:41 PM 896 Views
Dude, Seriously? - 18/12/2009 10:19:25 PM 909 Views
Indeed, and that's why I propose that... - 18/12/2009 10:31:23 PM 958 Views
Yes, "Bell Curve" does not mean Gausian. Or normal distribution. - 19/12/2009 11:24:10 PM 908 Views
It does to RJ - 20/12/2009 03:12:30 PM 989 Views
Yes, "Bell Curve" does not mean Gausian. Or normal distribution. - 19/12/2009 11:24:11 PM 881 Views
That's because outliers in IQ tests are excluded form the curve. *NM* - 18/12/2009 11:31:23 PM 512 Views
Really?!?! then what is the definition of a IQ of 200? - 19/12/2009 11:28:18 PM 1203 Views
You can have IQ's above that... - 20/12/2009 05:09:44 AM 931 Views
I said that in the other post and was half torn to pieces *NM* - 19/12/2009 11:38:25 AM 458 Views
Eh. Ignore the IQ value and draw it on a linear weight scale - 19/12/2009 11:26:23 PM 887 Views
Re: The One Power Bell Curve: Proof that it is not centered on 50% of the strongest channeler's stre - 19/12/2009 06:02:34 PM 869 Views
I like this idea - 20/12/2009 04:01:28 PM 1123 Views
Accidental Post *NM* - 20/12/2009 07:11:09 PM 503 Views
Mathmatically this is very close to the system I proposed in another thread - 27/12/2009 01:23:51 AM 856 Views
Re: The One Power Bell Curve: - 27/12/2009 10:05:33 PM 1038 Views
What makes you think Alviarin is "middling"? - 27/12/2009 10:28:13 PM 1232 Views
Re: What makes you think Alviarin is "middling"? - 28/12/2009 03:19:14 PM 901 Views
Re: What makes you think Alviarin is "middling"? - 28/12/2009 03:30:44 PM 1120 Views

Reply to Message