Brandon Sanderson is not Robert Jordan. Those who are disgruntled seem to fail to realize that no matter how hard one tries, there are going to be differences.
The past is just that, the past. You can only truly live by looking to the future!
Can't bring myself to re-read tGS
- 23/12/2009 12:01:33 PM
1789 Views
I think pretty much alone, yes
- 23/12/2009 01:39:52 PM
1177 Views
I have to agree...it was very enjoyable
- 23/12/2009 01:48:39 PM
1113 Views
I'm sorry you feel that way. I thought Sanderson did an outstanding job. *NM*
- 23/12/2009 04:30:16 PM
655 Views
People who post on WOT messageboards do not comprise a reprsentative sample
- 23/12/2009 07:01:48 PM
1069 Views
Re: People who post on WOT messageboards do not comprise a reprsentative sample
- 23/12/2009 10:34:15 PM
1139 Views
It was better than POD or COT if you ask me. It was as good as I could have asked for from BS *NM*
- 25/12/2009 12:10:51 AM
476 Views
OK, maybe the writting wasn't as good, but the story was better than the previous couple of books *NM*
- 29/12/2009 08:24:17 AM
428 Views
No, you're not. It was OK - I was more happy that the series seemed to be progressing
- 29/12/2009 03:43:59 PM
851 Views
Except for the Mat parts, it was fairly good.
- 30/12/2009 04:30:15 AM
909 Views
Yeah, CoT is one of the WoT books I don't even use as a reference. I try to forget it. *NM*
- 30/12/2009 03:53:25 PM
471 Views
The Mat parts were the only places I was jarred by the difference in writing style
- 14/01/2010 03:12:58 PM
882 Views
Sorry, but I think Jordan was not writing all that well himself anymore
- 14/01/2010 09:19:07 AM
1050 Views

*NM*