I dont know if it's my first favorite or second favorite *NM*
Nargs Send a noteboard - 23/12/2009 04:07:53 PM
Brandon Sanderson is not Robert Jordan. Those who are disgruntled seem to fail to realize that no matter how hard one tries, there are going to be differences.
Can't bring myself to re-read tGS
- 23/12/2009 12:01:33 PM
1770 Views
I think pretty much alone, yes
- 23/12/2009 01:39:52 PM
1151 Views
I have to agree...it was very enjoyable
- 23/12/2009 01:48:39 PM
1078 Views
I dont know if it's my first favorite or second favorite *NM*
- 23/12/2009 04:07:53 PM
454 Views
I'm sorry you feel that way. I thought Sanderson did an outstanding job. *NM*
- 23/12/2009 04:30:16 PM
638 Views
People who post on WOT messageboards do not comprise a reprsentative sample
- 23/12/2009 07:01:48 PM
1024 Views
Re: People who post on WOT messageboards do not comprise a reprsentative sample
- 23/12/2009 10:34:15 PM
1108 Views
It was better than POD or COT if you ask me. It was as good as I could have asked for from BS *NM*
- 25/12/2009 12:10:51 AM
461 Views
OK, maybe the writting wasn't as good, but the story was better than the previous couple of books *NM*
- 29/12/2009 08:24:17 AM
409 Views
No, you're not. It was OK - I was more happy that the series seemed to be progressing
- 29/12/2009 03:43:59 PM
830 Views
Except for the Mat parts, it was fairly good.
- 30/12/2009 04:30:15 AM
880 Views
Yeah, CoT is one of the WoT books I don't even use as a reference. I try to forget it. *NM*
- 30/12/2009 03:53:25 PM
452 Views
The Mat parts were the only places I was jarred by the difference in writing style
- 14/01/2010 03:12:58 PM
850 Views
Sorry, but I think Jordan was not writing all that well himself anymore
- 14/01/2010 09:19:07 AM
1022 Views

*NM*