Active Users:1267 Time:02/11/2025 08:24:28 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
No, you're not. It was OK - I was more happy that the series seemed to be progressing RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 29/12/2009 03:43:59 PM
I re-read it a couple of times, and the little inconsistencies you spoke of and others have referenced become more and more glaring each time. There were quite a few sections, especially during the Tower raid, that didn't have the pay off they should have.

I actually gave it to a friend of mines who started the series but didn't have time to buy the book before finals started for him. To put this into perspective, I've read through three different copies of The Shadow Rising so many times that each have fallen apart necessitating new purchases and have numerous bookmarks and dogears in Books II, III, V and VI. But with TGS I re-read a few sections, then gave it away to be returned later in 2010.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
This message last edited by RugbyPlayingAshaman on 29/12/2009 at 03:56:53 PM
Reply to message
Can't bring myself to re-read tGS Insomdeon - 23/12/2009 12:01:33 PM 1769 Views
I think pretty much alone, yes Etzel - 23/12/2009 01:39:52 PM 1151 Views
I have to agree...it was very enjoyable Ryan - 23/12/2009 01:48:39 PM 1078 Views
I dont know if it's my first favorite or second favorite *NM* Nargs - 23/12/2009 04:07:53 PM 453 Views
tGS is IMHO easily one of the top 5 books in the series. *NM* Asharak - 23/12/2009 04:28:34 PM 562 Views
No, tGS was a pile of crap. *NM* snusnu - 23/12/2009 02:52:40 PM 477 Views
I'm sorry you feel that way. I thought Sanderson did an outstanding job. *NM* Gher - 23/12/2009 04:30:16 PM 638 Views
There were parts that clearly needed some help... Phelix - 23/12/2009 05:23:22 PM 1062 Views
Pretty good given the circumstances. I'm grateful. Sandwich - 23/12/2009 06:49:46 PM 1162 Views
People who post on WOT messageboards do not comprise a reprsentative sample Betrayer of Hope - 23/12/2009 07:01:48 PM 1024 Views
Re: People who post on WOT messageboards do not comprise a reprsentative sample MissKoalaVB - 23/12/2009 10:34:15 PM 1107 Views
Boo hoo hoo. *NM* everynametaken - 24/12/2009 02:19:28 AM 431 Views
They could have just not finished the series. Crackbrained Asha'man - 24/12/2009 06:16:49 AM 1058 Views
It was better than POD or COT if you ask me. It was as good as I could have asked for from BS *NM* amirebram - 25/12/2009 12:10:51 AM 461 Views
OK, maybe the writting wasn't as good, but the story was better than the previous couple of books *NM* amirebram - 29/12/2009 08:24:17 AM 409 Views
Re: Can't bring myself to re-read tGS Madman - 27/12/2009 09:00:53 PM 904 Views
Wow. I thought it was a LOT better than some previous books. Erith - 27/12/2009 11:02:13 PM 1016 Views
No, you're not. It was OK - I was more happy that the series seemed to be progressing RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 03:43:59 PM 830 Views
Except for the Mat parts, it was fairly good. Mossman - 30/12/2009 04:30:15 AM 879 Views
Yeah, CoT is one of the WoT books I don't even use as a reference. I try to forget it. *NM* RugbyPlayingAshaman - 30/12/2009 03:53:25 PM 452 Views
It's kind of sad Mossman - 31/12/2009 03:25:03 AM 908 Views
The Mat parts were the only places I was jarred by the difference in writing style Sareitha Sedai - 14/01/2010 03:12:58 PM 850 Views
Re: Except for the Mat parts, it was fairly good. ajah - 17/01/2010 10:49:29 PM 983 Views
Sorry, but I think Jordan was not writing all that well himself anymore Mix - 14/01/2010 09:19:07 AM 1022 Views
I couldn't disagree more. ajah - 17/01/2010 11:06:52 PM 911 Views
Not alone! Zaphod - 19/01/2010 05:41:03 AM 863 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes