Active Users:458 Time:08/05/2025 01:35:00 AM
there is no such thing as a circle of 6 and 6 darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 16/01/2010 03:35:17 AM
BWB

Other gender mixes are possible in a link as well. The number of men in a circle is limited only be the fact that with the exceptions of the linking of one man and one woman or of two men and one woman ( and of course, of two men and two women), there must always be at least one more woman in the circle than the number of men. Thus, three men would need four women to be in a circle together, four men would need five women, and so on. There can also be smaller circles than thirteen, whether of women alone or of men and women.

The cumulative strength of a circle depends on its size, the strengths of the individuals linked, whether or not angreal or sa'angreal are used, and the balance between male and female members in the circle. Although men are stronger than women, the strongest linked circles were those which contained nearly equal numbers of men and women. A smaller circle with a closer balance can be stronger than a larger unbalanced circle.


Except in very small circles there must always be at least 1 more woman than men. And there is nothing to say that a circle of 37 women and 35 men is not the most potent.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
LTT and the bore. - 16/01/2010 02:50:34 AM 1431 Views
I think there is a scene in KoD or CoT - 16/01/2010 02:57:13 AM 730 Views
Re: I think there is a scene in KoD or CoT - 16/01/2010 03:23:14 AM 748 Views
I always thought the scene with Cadsuane an empty threat... - 16/01/2010 12:28:17 PM 655 Views
It had to be a circle of six men and six women... - 16/01/2010 03:18:16 AM 690 Views
there is no such thing as a circle of 6 and 6 - 16/01/2010 03:35:17 AM 606 Views
Re: It had to be a circle of six men and six women... - 16/01/2010 03:37:49 AM 677 Views
Here's the quote... - 16/01/2010 06:02:49 AM 727 Views
Re: Here's the quote... - 16/01/2010 04:00:11 PM 623 Views
Dude, you seem to not read what is written... - 16/01/2010 07:28:27 PM 626 Views
Hmm... - 18/01/2010 11:21:41 AM 558 Views
I think... - 16/01/2010 11:31:18 AM 719 Views
Re: I think... - 16/01/2010 01:27:40 PM 668 Views
In my view... - 16/01/2010 01:50:03 PM 528 Views
Re: In my view... - 16/01/2010 02:11:20 PM 537 Views
We know... - 16/01/2010 02:43:41 PM 659 Views
Its presented as fact - 16/01/2010 03:00:33 PM 544 Views
Here is a quote by RJ - 16/01/2010 03:10:28 PM 580 Views
Re: Here is a quote by RJ - 16/01/2010 03:26:13 PM 619 Views
In my opinion - 16/01/2010 03:51:02 PM 522 Views
RJ was as slippery as an AS! - 16/01/2010 04:31:02 PM 535 Views
Re: RJ was as slippery as an AS! - 18/01/2010 06:09:40 AM 492 Views
RJ could be tricky, true... - 19/01/2010 02:56:05 PM 504 Views
RJ changed his mind about a lot of stuff throughout the series - 22/01/2010 06:35:09 PM 540 Views
Re: We know... - 16/01/2010 03:17:54 PM 607 Views
It's in any case clear... - 16/01/2010 03:27:49 PM 510 Views
Re: It's in any case clear... - 16/01/2010 03:44:33 PM 570 Views
I don't think - 16/01/2010 03:56:25 PM 553 Views
The question is how many people were still alive? - 18/01/2010 06:19:49 AM 590 Views
Indeed. *NM* - 19/01/2010 02:47:58 PM 207 Views
Did you read my second post? *NM* - 16/01/2010 03:42:23 PM 323 Views
My Thoughts - 16/01/2010 09:43:33 PM 530 Views
The women needed to balance the men - 18/01/2010 12:12:27 PM 607 Views
What if Rand usesTP to off the DO? - 22/01/2010 05:54:13 PM 527 Views

Reply to Message