Active Users:616 Time:13/06/2026 02:47:26 PM
Re: Graendal's main task in TGS Underwood Send a noteboard - 28/01/2010 04:29:42 PM
I agree with you mainly, though (I guess just to be nitpicking) I wouldn't say that causing pain of heart is a lesser goal, rather than just a second goal. The first goal is her goal because she's set up there. Her second one is her goal if she has opportunity to pursue it. That was my interpretation, at least.
Reply to message
Graendal's main task in TGS - 28/01/2010 02:42:39 PM 1227 Views
Re: Graendal's main task in TGS - 28/01/2010 04:29:42 PM 769 Views
I think Graendal ignores Moridin just like the others do - 28/01/2010 04:33:59 PM 559 Views
I think the other Forsaken don't understand Moridin really, just consider him crazy - 28/01/2010 05:08:34 PM 583 Views
Yes - 28/01/2010 06:16:07 PM 546 Views
Yes, especially because of an additional difficulty - 28/01/2010 07:15:40 PM 551 Views
That's a good point. - 28/01/2010 07:23:17 PM 493 Views
I generally agree (except for the Gandalf part.. ) - 29/01/2010 02:08:32 PM 495 Views
The was just a byproduct of my twisted brain *NM* - 30/01/2010 02:26:16 AM 208 Views
I more or less agree. - 28/01/2010 07:22:38 PM 690 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 29/01/2010 12:54:34 PM 472 Views
Re: Graendal's main task in TGS - 28/01/2010 08:52:25 PM 484 Views
Moridin had told Graendal before... - 29/01/2010 12:59:29 PM 571 Views
Re: Graendal's main task in TGS - 29/01/2010 05:35:55 PM 497 Views
And there is absolutely no indication that she tried to give Rand pain of heart in TGS... - 29/01/2010 06:10:59 PM 689 Views
Nor is there an indication that she didn't. - 29/01/2010 06:27:26 PM 445 Views
That is not a valid argument... - 29/01/2010 06:50:40 PM 753 Views
Re: That is not a valid argument... - 01/02/2010 04:53:56 PM 430 Views
Moridin's aim was to keep Graendal in Arad Doman. - 29/01/2010 06:37:50 PM 483 Views
You mean that Moridin sacrified Graendal, do I understand this right? *NM* - 29/01/2010 07:13:56 PM 210 Views
Yeah, that's what I suspect at least. No hard evidence... yet. *NM* - 30/01/2010 06:39:48 AM 202 Views
I don't think so - 01/02/2010 05:04:39 PM 434 Views
Re: I don't think so - 02/02/2010 07:10:58 AM 446 Views

Reply to Message