Active Users:598 Time:13/06/2026 02:44:36 PM
Nor is there an indication that she didn't. RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 29/01/2010 06:27:26 PM
I'm comfortable just thinking she might have gone for extra points and did this.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
Graendal's main task in TGS - 28/01/2010 02:42:39 PM 1227 Views
Re: Graendal's main task in TGS - 28/01/2010 04:29:42 PM 767 Views
I think Graendal ignores Moridin just like the others do - 28/01/2010 04:33:59 PM 559 Views
I think the other Forsaken don't understand Moridin really, just consider him crazy - 28/01/2010 05:08:34 PM 583 Views
Yes - 28/01/2010 06:16:07 PM 544 Views
Yes, especially because of an additional difficulty - 28/01/2010 07:15:40 PM 550 Views
That's a good point. - 28/01/2010 07:23:17 PM 493 Views
I generally agree (except for the Gandalf part.. ) - 29/01/2010 02:08:32 PM 494 Views
The was just a byproduct of my twisted brain *NM* - 30/01/2010 02:26:16 AM 208 Views
I more or less agree. - 28/01/2010 07:22:38 PM 690 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 29/01/2010 12:54:34 PM 470 Views
Re: Graendal's main task in TGS - 28/01/2010 08:52:25 PM 484 Views
Moridin had told Graendal before... - 29/01/2010 12:59:29 PM 570 Views
Re: Graendal's main task in TGS - 29/01/2010 05:35:55 PM 497 Views
And there is absolutely no indication that she tried to give Rand pain of heart in TGS... - 29/01/2010 06:10:59 PM 689 Views
Nor is there an indication that she didn't. - 29/01/2010 06:27:26 PM 444 Views
That is not a valid argument... - 29/01/2010 06:50:40 PM 753 Views
Re: That is not a valid argument... - 01/02/2010 04:53:56 PM 430 Views
Moridin's aim was to keep Graendal in Arad Doman. - 29/01/2010 06:37:50 PM 483 Views
You mean that Moridin sacrified Graendal, do I understand this right? *NM* - 29/01/2010 07:13:56 PM 210 Views
Yeah, that's what I suspect at least. No hard evidence... yet. *NM* - 30/01/2010 06:39:48 AM 202 Views
I don't think so - 01/02/2010 05:04:39 PM 434 Views
Re: I don't think so - 02/02/2010 07:10:58 AM 446 Views

Reply to Message