Active Users:253 Time:07/05/2024 12:25:58 AM
My interpretation... Etzel Send a noteboard - 04/02/2010 09:55:17 AM
Is that the "it" in the controversial sentence "it looked as if it had been designed specifically for Rand" refers to the "weapon", which is also mentioned in the previous sentence alongside the scabbard.

In my opinion, it means that the proportions of the sword, especially its length, perfectly fit Rand's tallness.

I believe that makes more sense than the idea that Hawkwing had a scabbard with a dragon on it, or that the scabbard could survive under water for so many years. Also in the other quotes by Rand, he only mentions that the "weapon" was found beneath the statue and that the "sword" felt old. And as we see in the sentence before the controversial sentence, Rand explicitly differs between the weapon and the scabbard, i.e. the scabbard isn't a part of the weapon/sword in Rand's view.

If one follows my interpretation nothing else suggests that the scabbard is old. Probably it was then recently made for the sword, since the weapon was supposed to be a gift for the DR.
This message last edited by Etzel on 04/02/2010 at 09:59:03 AM
Reply to message
Where Justice was found - 03/02/2010 02:18:56 PM 1870 Views
I wish someone could adequately explain this Justice thing to me - 03/02/2010 03:49:09 PM 887 Views
I think... - 03/02/2010 03:59:24 PM 674 Views
Got a link to the Justice confirmation? - 03/02/2010 05:30:23 PM 571 Views
Here... - 03/02/2010 06:19:36 PM 719 Views
Sound reasoning. - 03/02/2010 07:12:17 PM 549 Views
Mabey - 03/02/2010 08:44:17 PM 551 Views
I like your idea as well! *NM* - 04/02/2010 09:45:05 AM 237 Views
I think the scabbard is as old as the sword ... - 03/02/2010 09:37:55 PM 774 Views
So then.... - 03/02/2010 09:47:17 PM 553 Views
Or perhpas Justice was Guaire Amalasan's sword before he got beat down by AH - 03/02/2010 09:51:20 PM 618 Views
Which is possible... - 03/02/2010 09:53:09 PM 551 Views
I'd have to check, but wasn't there AS associated with GA? - 03/02/2010 10:09:32 PM 538 Views
Re: So then.... - 03/02/2010 10:02:28 PM 537 Views
My interpretation... - 04/02/2010 09:55:17 AM 520 Views

Reply to Message