Active Users:597 Time:16/06/2026 08:54:38 PM
My interpretation... Etzel Send a noteboard - 04/02/2010 09:55:17 AM
Is that the "it" in the controversial sentence "it looked as if it had been designed specifically for Rand" refers to the "weapon", which is also mentioned in the previous sentence alongside the scabbard.

In my opinion, it means that the proportions of the sword, especially its length, perfectly fit Rand's tallness.

I believe that makes more sense than the idea that Hawkwing had a scabbard with a dragon on it, or that the scabbard could survive under water for so many years. Also in the other quotes by Rand, he only mentions that the "weapon" was found beneath the statue and that the "sword" felt old. And as we see in the sentence before the controversial sentence, Rand explicitly differs between the weapon and the scabbard, i.e. the scabbard isn't a part of the weapon/sword in Rand's view.

If one follows my interpretation nothing else suggests that the scabbard is old. Probably it was then recently made for the sword, since the weapon was supposed to be a gift for the DR.
This message last edited by Etzel on 04/02/2010 at 09:59:03 AM
Reply to message
Where Justice was found - 03/02/2010 02:18:56 PM 2191 Views
I wish someone could adequately explain this Justice thing to me - 03/02/2010 03:49:09 PM 1221 Views
I think... - 03/02/2010 03:59:24 PM 1037 Views
Got a link to the Justice confirmation? - 03/02/2010 05:30:23 PM 916 Views
Here... - 03/02/2010 06:19:36 PM 1097 Views
Sound reasoning. - 03/02/2010 07:12:17 PM 907 Views
Mabey - 03/02/2010 08:44:17 PM 907 Views
I like your idea as well! *NM* - 04/02/2010 09:45:05 AM 379 Views
I think the scabbard is as old as the sword ... - 03/02/2010 09:37:55 PM 1069 Views
So then.... - 03/02/2010 09:47:17 PM 964 Views
Or perhpas Justice was Guaire Amalasan's sword before he got beat down by AH - 03/02/2010 09:51:20 PM 994 Views
Which is possible... - 03/02/2010 09:53:09 PM 932 Views
I'd have to check, but wasn't there AS associated with GA? - 03/02/2010 10:09:32 PM 845 Views
Re: So then.... - 03/02/2010 10:02:28 PM 888 Views
My interpretation... - 04/02/2010 09:55:17 AM 847 Views

Reply to Message