Active Users:382 Time:05/03/2026 06:03:31 PM
My interpretation... Etzel Send a noteboard - 04/02/2010 09:55:17 AM
Is that the "it" in the controversial sentence "it looked as if it had been designed specifically for Rand" refers to the "weapon", which is also mentioned in the previous sentence alongside the scabbard.

In my opinion, it means that the proportions of the sword, especially its length, perfectly fit Rand's tallness.

I believe that makes more sense than the idea that Hawkwing had a scabbard with a dragon on it, or that the scabbard could survive under water for so many years. Also in the other quotes by Rand, he only mentions that the "weapon" was found beneath the statue and that the "sword" felt old. And as we see in the sentence before the controversial sentence, Rand explicitly differs between the weapon and the scabbard, i.e. the scabbard isn't a part of the weapon/sword in Rand's view.

If one follows my interpretation nothing else suggests that the scabbard is old. Probably it was then recently made for the sword, since the weapon was supposed to be a gift for the DR.
This message last edited by Etzel on 04/02/2010 at 09:59:03 AM
Reply to message
Where Justice was found - 03/02/2010 02:18:56 PM 2122 Views
I wish someone could adequately explain this Justice thing to me - 03/02/2010 03:49:09 PM 1176 Views
I think... - 03/02/2010 03:59:24 PM 983 Views
Got a link to the Justice confirmation? - 03/02/2010 05:30:23 PM 862 Views
Here... - 03/02/2010 06:19:36 PM 1040 Views
Sound reasoning. - 03/02/2010 07:12:17 PM 848 Views
Mabey - 03/02/2010 08:44:17 PM 848 Views
I like your idea as well! *NM* - 04/02/2010 09:45:05 AM 352 Views
I think the scabbard is as old as the sword ... - 03/02/2010 09:37:55 PM 1017 Views
So then.... - 03/02/2010 09:47:17 PM 898 Views
Or perhpas Justice was Guaire Amalasan's sword before he got beat down by AH - 03/02/2010 09:51:20 PM 938 Views
Which is possible... - 03/02/2010 09:53:09 PM 876 Views
I'd have to check, but wasn't there AS associated with GA? - 03/02/2010 10:09:32 PM 794 Views
Re: So then.... - 03/02/2010 10:02:28 PM 830 Views
My interpretation... - 04/02/2010 09:55:17 AM 803 Views

Reply to Message