Active Users:632 Time:15/10/2025 03:23:43 AM
You are indeed right Etzel Send a noteboard - 22/03/2010 09:35:28 AM
Ok a big argument about his possible killer is the speed to kill a channeler thing...

I have a problem here. Many seem to think that a channeler is like a freakin god. It's just not that way. Think how many asha'man dropped to aiel spears coming out of the gateways. These dude were ready for combat. Asmodean was not, he was opening a door to get some damn wine. on top of that he hesitated because of the shock of knowing his killer. So really any person knowing how to use a knife could have done it. disagree? perhaps because of the issue with needing to be killed ultra fast, words still in the air when death took him and all that? well a knife across the throat can do that, even a two rivers bumkin could have been the killer.

My point with this post? If theories are going to be properly sifted through we should at least use the proper criteria.


Many people wrongly believe that only a channeler could have killed Asmo, while - as it is pointed out and shown several times in the series - the key for a non-channeler to kill a channeler is simply surprise and speed. RJ even stated that Fain would have killed Asmo, if he had been there. And as most know, Fain isn't a channeler..

PS it cant be balefire. if the words were still in the air when death took him it could NOT be balefire. The weave would have erased the words before they ever happened even the smallest amount possible. :p


Balefire can't be the weapon, because RJ said that the DO couldn't transmigrate Asmo because of how and where he died. Even Moiraine's weak balefire could prevent the DO from transmigrating Be'lal. Therefore it simply makes no sense that an even stronger channeler balefired Asmo, but the DO still could have transmigrated him (apparently if he hadn't died in Caemlyn, which also doesn't make much sense).
This message last edited by Etzel on 22/03/2010 at 10:11:25 AM
Reply to message
Asmodeans killer. - 21/03/2010 11:20:18 PM 1210 Views
Re: Asmodeans killer. - 21/03/2010 11:51:14 PM 701 Views
Re: Asmodeans killer. - 22/03/2010 12:01:33 AM 587 Views
Re: Asmodeans killer. - 22/03/2010 12:27:33 AM 808 Views
Not how I learned about it. - 22/03/2010 12:46:10 AM 591 Views
Well we're not really just talking about any channeler. - 22/03/2010 12:36:53 AM 610 Views
bad examples - 22/03/2010 03:08:10 AM 600 Views
Well everyone knows - 22/03/2010 06:21:16 AM 564 Views
You are indeed right - 22/03/2010 09:35:28 AM 546 Views
Channelers aren't gods, but it only takes moments or seconds to weave for experienced channelers - 22/03/2010 02:23:02 PM 564 Views
Rand himself says... - 22/03/2010 02:47:16 PM 590 Views
Re: Rand himself says... - 22/03/2010 03:18:29 PM 534 Views
However... - 22/03/2010 03:33:50 PM 538 Views
Re: However... - 22/03/2010 04:48:08 PM 552 Views
As I always said... - 23/03/2010 09:10:14 AM 488 Views
I think Fain would be more likely. - 23/03/2010 01:48:06 PM 494 Views
Fain was always just a crackpot candidate, but RJ has ruled him out as a suspect anyway. - 23/03/2010 02:24:55 PM 531 Views
But souls have never been said to be destroyed in T'A'R - 23/03/2010 03:37:22 PM 548 Views
I think many readers would agree with your second point... - 23/03/2010 04:14:14 PM 536 Views
Re: I think many readers would agree with your second point... - 24/03/2010 12:10:14 AM 533 Views
Bashere also didn't give him a warning. - 22/03/2010 05:51:58 PM 551 Views
Rand also saw Bashere's weapon before. *NM* - 23/03/2010 09:03:31 AM 228 Views
Re: Asmodeans killer. - 29/03/2010 11:19:43 PM 498 Views
Criteria - 08/04/2010 12:51:27 AM 486 Views
Re: Criteria - 11/05/2010 01:27:55 AM 531 Views
It was Nick cave! - 19/04/2010 10:40:44 AM 688 Views
One possibility you dont mention - 11/05/2010 01:23:26 AM 543 Views
Re: One possibility you dont mention - 11/05/2010 11:02:34 AM 526 Views
IMO... - 11/05/2010 11:31:02 AM 533 Views
Re: One possibility you dont mention - 14/05/2010 12:37:19 AM 522 Views
Re: One possibility you dont mention - 15/05/2010 09:56:28 PM 481 Views

Reply to Message