Active Users:2428 Time:18/06/2026 11:46:05 AM
Not for my purposes. Cannoli Send a noteboard - 10/04/2010 03:42:37 AM
But still, the effect is the same, isn't it?

The gateway stays open.



My point in asking was to determine if permanently tied off gateways could be set up as transportation/communication aids for normal people, and to relieve the pressure on the channelers from having to do all the gateways each time one is needed. Since Rand's method of blocking Aviendha's gateway was failing visibly, it would not suffice for the purpose which I would have used a tied off gateway. I was seeking confirmation that if you wove a gateway and tied it off, it would stay that way indefinitely. I will be posting a thread fairly soon contemplating the possibilities of this weave, and I wanted to see if it was possible or if I was forgetting something in the books that rendered the idea moot.
Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless

“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Reply to message
Can gateways be tied off? - 07/04/2010 11:52:42 PM 1763 Views
hmm - 08/04/2010 12:29:41 AM 880 Views
Re: Can gateways be tied off? - 08/04/2010 12:56:04 AM 951 Views
Good points. - 08/04/2010 02:51:55 AM 901 Views
Sammael - 08/04/2010 01:49:08 AM 944 Views
I'd imagine that it'd be possible. - 08/04/2010 03:46:13 AM 985 Views
Yup they can be.... - 08/04/2010 06:25:28 AM 1259 Views
Interesting - 08/04/2010 11:03:08 AM 992 Views
yes about the warder bond - 08/04/2010 02:13:19 PM 821 Views
I always thought the gateway trick was Brandon's too - 08/04/2010 05:23:52 PM 788 Views
Re: Interesting - 09/04/2010 02:36:43 PM 747 Views
Re: Yup they can be.... - 08/04/2010 03:26:37 PM 816 Views
Re: Yup they can be.... - 08/04/2010 11:20:30 PM 792 Views
Uh, yes. Can't believe you forgot this one. - 08/04/2010 08:36:04 PM 781 Views
Re: Uh, yes. Can't believe you forgot this one. - 08/04/2010 09:03:35 PM 822 Views
Aha! Pie on my face! - 09/04/2010 12:42:47 AM 807 Views
Not for my purposes. - 10/04/2010 03:42:37 AM 785 Views
Re: Not for my purposes. - 10/04/2010 10:38:05 AM 741 Views

Reply to Message