Active Users:414 Time:17/06/2025 07:32:50 PM
Not for my purposes. Cannoli Send a noteboard - 10/04/2010 03:42:37 AM
But still, the effect is the same, isn't it?

The gateway stays open.



My point in asking was to determine if permanently tied off gateways could be set up as transportation/communication aids for normal people, and to relieve the pressure on the channelers from having to do all the gateways each time one is needed. Since Rand's method of blocking Aviendha's gateway was failing visibly, it would not suffice for the purpose which I would have used a tied off gateway. I was seeking confirmation that if you wove a gateway and tied it off, it would stay that way indefinitely. I will be posting a thread fairly soon contemplating the possibilities of this weave, and I wanted to see if it was possible or if I was forgetting something in the books that rendered the idea moot.
Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless

“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Reply to message
Can gateways be tied off? - 07/04/2010 11:52:42 PM 1572 Views
hmm - 08/04/2010 12:29:41 AM 732 Views
Re: Can gateways be tied off? - 08/04/2010 12:56:04 AM 796 Views
Good points. - 08/04/2010 02:51:55 AM 745 Views
Sammael - 08/04/2010 01:49:08 AM 789 Views
I'd imagine that it'd be possible. - 08/04/2010 03:46:13 AM 824 Views
Yup they can be.... - 08/04/2010 06:25:28 AM 1063 Views
Interesting - 08/04/2010 11:03:08 AM 818 Views
yes about the warder bond - 08/04/2010 02:13:19 PM 679 Views
I always thought the gateway trick was Brandon's too - 08/04/2010 05:23:52 PM 631 Views
Re: Interesting - 09/04/2010 02:36:43 PM 602 Views
Re: Yup they can be.... - 08/04/2010 03:26:37 PM 666 Views
Re: Yup they can be.... - 08/04/2010 11:20:30 PM 617 Views
Uh, yes. Can't believe you forgot this one. - 08/04/2010 08:36:04 PM 629 Views
Re: Uh, yes. Can't believe you forgot this one. - 08/04/2010 09:03:35 PM 677 Views
Aha! Pie on my face! - 09/04/2010 12:42:47 AM 667 Views
Not for my purposes. - 10/04/2010 03:42:37 AM 629 Views
Re: Not for my purposes. - 10/04/2010 10:38:05 AM 598 Views

Reply to Message