Active Users:253 Time:23/04/2024 08:57:54 AM
Re: I honestly have no idea what you are talking about. Fanatic - 16/01/2003 10:01:41 AM

i already know that you'll most likely ignore this and not deign to respond. i also know that you know that i said that only to try to goad you into replying. what i don't know is whether i care to hear your reply.

Hm. Perhaps I have said something to you before, or flamed you, or some such. If so, it was all in jest, for I cannot recall ever ignoring you or some such, unless you have posted messages in the vein of ignorant anti-Americanism, which can only serve to make my brain throb. IF that is the case, it is far more likely that I grew tired of various misperceptions and unsupported assertions. Anyway, I felt no need to ignore you; whatever problem you think we've had in the past, I cannot recall it.

you see, fan, you're as deeply 'ideologically entrenched' as the rest of us. as you already (needlessly) pointed out, it's easy to guess the direction (nearly) any given personality will take on certain (non)issues.

Oh yes, of course I am.

you, just as an example, specialise in making others look like fools. most often, it's easy to do. sometimes it takes a bit of thought, but that's when it's really fun. unfortunately, it doesn't work in all cases. that's when you can ignore the person entirely and say 'it's not worth my time to talk to this idiot.'

I would disagree. Normally, if I put thought into it, I can make anyone look like a fool. If I have failed with you in the past, I am quite desirous of having another shot. Of course, as I say, I cannot recall ever having a discussion with you. More likely, you are taking a case where I did not even know I was trying to make someome into the fool. If so, I apologize, for it obviously bothered you in some sense.

But what you speak of above (I do not believe) is not what I spoke of in my post. The actions that you outline as belonging to me are just that, actions, acting. I grow bored, I do not try to appease my boredom.

but here's the problem, fan: most people are so caught up with absurd ideas like 'right' and 'wrong.' worse still, they apply them to ideas and situations and people that are simply too complex to be labelled with a blanket black-or-white response. and worst of all, it never occurs to them that we're all an expression of infinity, and therefore necessary.

Yes, people do have their own ideas of right and wrong, and try to apply them to situations of varying interpretations of right and wrong. That is where disputes come forth, to be argued into the everlasting stalemate of "you're a dumby-eared elephant-face".


Here be Myth




View/create new replies Sign up for a premium account to add posts to a list of favourites!
Random Thoughts on Perceptions and other Silly Vaguenesses. - 15/01/2003 11:22:57 PM 209 Views
I'm of a few minds on this, to be honest - 15/01/2003 11:30:34 PM 38 Views
Re: It must be difficult ordering Chinese food. - 15/01/2003 11:35:35 PM 30 Views
Chinese food makes me sick - 16/01/2003 12:11:44 AM 19 Views
Okay, maybe a serious response - 15/01/2003 11:41:10 PM 35 Views
Re: Ketchup. - 15/01/2003 11:46:09 PM 23 Views
I don't have (edit) DETAILED (/edit) opinions on those matters - 15/01/2003 11:48:00 PM 25 Views
Re: Uhh... - 15/01/2003 11:52:31 PM 20 Views
Hahaha. - 15/01/2003 11:54:15 PM 20 Views
*cough* Nietzsche? Freud, Jung, Crowley, Leary... *NM* - 16/01/2003 07:25:53 PM 15 Views
I'll give you Jung - 16/01/2003 08:45:00 PM 39 Views
I resent that you identify me with that Crime Syndicate. - 15/01/2003 11:55:37 PM 26 Views
GUBERNATORIAL - 15/01/2003 11:56:24 PM 19 Views
Re: Ah, then I apologize. - 16/01/2003 12:01:06 AM 17 Views
Liberal indeed. - 16/01/2003 12:04:27 AM 22 Views
Re: For me. - 16/01/2003 12:11:20 AM 20 Views
Re: Litmuses... - 16/01/2003 12:21:22 AM 18 Views
First you take the intuition... - 16/01/2003 01:09:19 AM 25 Views
Re: I will get to this later. (I will edit this message) *NM* - 16/01/2003 10:21:24 AM 11 Views
Re: Well. - 16/01/2003 09:16:24 PM 22 Views
Re: First you take the intuition... - 17/01/2003 09:18:29 PM 11 Views
Druid's Random Thoughts on Perceptions and other Silly Vaguenesses. - 16/01/2003 01:10:11 AM 36 Views
Re: Of course. - 16/01/2003 10:10:17 AM 18 Views
a response. - 16/01/2003 04:11:50 AM 36 Views
Re: I honestly have no idea what you are talking about. - 16/01/2003 10:01:41 AM 21 Views
hold on there, jumper. - 16/01/2003 04:42:36 PM 22 Views
You are young yet. - 16/01/2003 06:18:58 AM 30 Views
Re: You are completely incorrect. - 16/01/2003 09:47:54 AM 30 Views
Have you both read the same things? - 16/01/2003 10:26:25 AM 27 Views
Re: Nearly Identical... - 16/01/2003 04:11:42 PM 21 Views
Re: Ah, but you hit directly onto my questioning. - 16/01/2003 08:00:19 PM 18 Views
Re: Ah, but you hit directly onto my questioning. - 16/01/2003 08:46:44 PM 16 Views
Re: I see your point. *NM* - 16/01/2003 09:32:49 PM 14 Views
Definitions and Predictability - 16/01/2003 05:49:24 PM 20 Views
Re: Hm, yes. - 16/01/2003 07:44:32 PM 14 Views
What the Thinker thinks, the Prover proves.. - 16/01/2003 07:11:54 PM 27 Views
Re: - 16/01/2003 07:50:52 PM 17 Views
Yeah, - 17/01/2003 06:55:37 PM 17 Views
www.rawilson.com *NM* - 16/01/2003 08:50:30 PM 10 Views
What can i say, i've been reading a lot of Wilson again. *NM* - 17/01/2003 06:58:12 PM 17 Views
French Canadian Bean Soup. *NM* - 18/01/2003 01:17:46 AM 27 Views
Thank you Sir Squirrelalot! *NM* - 17/01/2003 08:01:00 PM 13 Views